On the way to the authentic being: phenomenological destruction of Aristotle in early Heidegger’s teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent28.01.063Keywords:
early Heidegger, phenomenological destruction, fundamental ontology, «Being and time», phronêsis, first philosophyAbstract
The article investigates specific features of phenomenological destruction of Aristotle by early Heidegger. Interpretation of Aristotle’s philosophy is considered in the light of his devel-oping the project of fundamental ontology and first approaches to «Being and time». Heideg-ger’s interpretation of Aristotle’s thinking, on the one hand, has considerable hermeneutics potential, but, on the other hand, violently reinterprets the main motives and principles of Aris-totle’s philosophy. Heidegger in his interpretation of Aristotle’s texts proceeds from not quite clarified presuppositions and implicitly uses in his exegesis quasi-normativistic and quasi-personalistics conceptual schemes.
References
Arthemenko, N. A. (2013). Heidegger’s «lost manuscript» towards «Being and Time». [In Russian]. St-Peterburg: Gumanitarnaia akademiia.
Bohachov, A. (2011). Experience and meaning. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i litera.
Figal, G. (1992). Heidegger zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2007). Heidegger’s ways: the study of late work. [In Russian]. Minsk: Propilei.
Heidegger, M. (1994). Gesamtausgabe: Bd. 61, Phänomenologie Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. (W. Bröcker, & K. Bröcker-Oltmanns, Hrsg.). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2012). Phenomenological interpretation of Aristotle (exposition of the hermeneutic situation). [In Russian]. St-Peterburg: Gumanitarnaia akademiia.
Kisiel, T. (1993). The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley, & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Philipse, H. (1998). Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. A critical interpretation. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Bohachov, A. (2011). Experience and meaning. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i litera.
Figal, G. (1992). Heidegger zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2007). Heidegger’s ways: the study of late work. [In Russian]. Minsk: Propilei.
Heidegger, M. (1994). Gesamtausgabe: Bd. 61, Phänomenologie Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. (W. Bröcker, & K. Bröcker-Oltmanns, Hrsg.). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2012). Phenomenological interpretation of Aristotle (exposition of the hermeneutic situation). [In Russian]. St-Peterburg: Gumanitarnaia akademiia.
Kisiel, T. (1993). The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley, & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Philipse, H. (1998). Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. A critical interpretation. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 274
Abstract views: 408
Published
2013-06-16
How to Cite
Baumeister, A. (2013). On the way to the authentic being: phenomenological destruction of Aristotle in early Heidegger’s teaching. Sententiae, 28(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent28.01.063
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
