Transcendental Schematism and Scheme of Intelligible World. Kant and Plato
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent03.01.003Abstract
Kant considers unity of aim as connected to the form of a whole, what makes impossible to reject any of its parts. Science emerges a priori as an idea which, requiring for its own realization a scheme, due to unity of the aim architectonically makes the whole possible. Scheme of science divides the whole in connection with its idea. Kant opposes science and technic, i.e. accidental efficient deeds, which cannot constitute the whole. Plato considers the One to be prior principle. Connection between the One and intelligible to the mind is indicated by scheme. Therefore, the author aims to compare two types of schematism. Need do divide the whole serves as a basis for comparison. Plato needs it to dialectically envisage scheme of division the whole. Kant – to divide the whole in connection to aim.
References
Baumeister, A. (2000). Ontology and analytics of pure reason. [In Ukrainian]. Magisterium, (3), 27-37.
Baumeister, А. О. (2000). Transcendental ideal as consistent apprehension of absolute. Reinterpretation of I. Kant`s critical philosophy the first principle. [In Ukrainian]. In А. М. Loy (Ed.), Kantian studies 1999: Annual of Kantian society in Ukraine (pp. 104-118). Kyiv: Tandem.
Beierwaltes, W. (1965). Proklos. Grundzuege seiner Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Cassirer, E. (1997). Kant's Life and Thought. [In Russian]. Saint-Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga.
Heidegger, М. (1997). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. [In Russian]. Moscow: Logos.
Henrich, D. (1973). Die Beweisstruktur von Kants transzendentaler Deduktion. In G. Prauss (Hrsg.), Kant. Zur Deutung seiner Theorie von Erkennen und Handeln (SS. 90-104). Koeln.
Kaulbach, F. (1973). Schema. Bild und Modell nach den Voraussetzungen des
Kantischen Denkens. In G. Prauss (Hrsg.), Kant. Zur Deutung seiner Theorie von Erkennen und Handeln (SS. 105-129). Koeln.
Losev, А. F. (1963-1964). History of ancient esthetique (Vols. 1-8). [In Russian]. Moscow: Vyshshaya Shkola.
Losev, А. F. (1993). Outlines of ancient symbolism and mythology. [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.
Martin, G. (1965). Allgemeine Metaphysik. Ihre Probleme und ihre Methode. Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110841374
Meinhardt, H. (1990). Platon Der Sophist. Einleitung, Uebersetzung und Kommentar.
Stuttgart: Reclam.
Natorp, P. (1921). Platos Ideenlehre. Eine Einfuehrung in den Idealismus. Leipzig: F. Meiner.
Stenzel, J. (1971). Metaphysik des Altertums. Wien: WBG.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 14
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
