Understanding of Real Being: debatable questions of Thomist' Epistemology in the light of contemporary studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent24.01.005Abstract
The article analyzes current debates around the Realistic Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas. Is Aquinas’ Epistemology a version of Empirism or Aposteriorism? The author answers this question negatively and criticizes accordingly the positions of Mieczysław Krąpiec and Stefan Swieżawski. Is it possible to say what Thomas denies a priori knowledge? Attentive perusal of the texts of Aquinas show, that there is a theory of formal a priori. Is it possible to say, what Aquinas’ Epistemology is a version of Representationalism? The article proves that this is not the case. In what sense Aquinas admits the theory of ideas? The author of the article gives his particular attention to this question and proves that Aquinas’ theory of ideas appears as a result of correction of the views Augustine (and Platonism in general).References
Baumeister, A. (2010). Apophatism in St. Thomas Aquinas' Thinking. Philosophical Thought - Sententiae, 1, 5-19.
Heinzmann, R. (1994). Thomas von Aquin. Eine Einführung in sein Denken. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Kenny, A. (1993). Aquinas on Mind. London, & New York: Routledge.
Krąpiec, M. A. (1995). Dzieła II. Realism ludzkiego poznania. Lublin: KUL.
Laporte, J. (2000). Le rationalisme de Descartes. (4th ed.). Paris: PUF.
Mondin, B. (1991). Dizionario enciclopedico del pensiero di San Tommaso d'Aquino. Bologna: Edizioni Studio Domenicano.
Perler, D. (2004). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. https://doi.org/10.3196/9783465032892
Pieper, J. (1966). Tomasz z Akwinu. Kraków: Znak.
Secundant, S. (2009). Thomas Aquinas and Descartes: an idea as an object of cognition. Sententiae 19-20, 43-70.
Swięty Tomasz z Akwinu. (2006). De ideis. O ideach. Lublin: KUL.
Swieżawski, S. (1995). Saint Thomas, read anew. Symbol, 33, 7-183.
Swieżawski, S. (2000). Swięty Tomasz z Akwinu. Traktat o człowieku. Kęty: Antyk.
Vries, J. (1955). Kantische und thomistische Erkenntnistheorie. In J. B Lotz (Hrsg.), Kant und die Scholastik heute (pp. 1-34). Pullach bei München: Verlag Berchmanskolleg.
Willaschek, M. (2003). Der mentale Zugang zur Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Heinzmann, R. (1994). Thomas von Aquin. Eine Einführung in sein Denken. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Kenny, A. (1993). Aquinas on Mind. London, & New York: Routledge.
Krąpiec, M. A. (1995). Dzieła II. Realism ludzkiego poznania. Lublin: KUL.
Laporte, J. (2000). Le rationalisme de Descartes. (4th ed.). Paris: PUF.
Mondin, B. (1991). Dizionario enciclopedico del pensiero di San Tommaso d'Aquino. Bologna: Edizioni Studio Domenicano.
Perler, D. (2004). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. https://doi.org/10.3196/9783465032892
Pieper, J. (1966). Tomasz z Akwinu. Kraków: Znak.
Secundant, S. (2009). Thomas Aquinas and Descartes: an idea as an object of cognition. Sententiae 19-20, 43-70.
Swięty Tomasz z Akwinu. (2006). De ideis. O ideach. Lublin: KUL.
Swieżawski, S. (1995). Saint Thomas, read anew. Symbol, 33, 7-183.
Swieżawski, S. (2000). Swięty Tomasz z Akwinu. Traktat o człowieku. Kęty: Antyk.
Vries, J. (1955). Kantische und thomistische Erkenntnistheorie. In J. B Lotz (Hrsg.), Kant und die Scholastik heute (pp. 1-34). Pullach bei München: Verlag Berchmanskolleg.
Willaschek, M. (2003). Der mentale Zugang zur Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 195
Abstract views: 627
Published
2011-06-16
How to Cite
Baumeister, A. (2011). Understanding of Real Being: debatable questions of Thomist’ Epistemology in the light of contemporary studies. Sententiae, 24(1), 05–25. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent24.01.005
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
