The idea of modern and the Western tradition. Article 2

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent12.01.152

Keywords:

Enlightenment project, mind, nature, universalism, values

Abstract

The Enlightenment invented a new unique format for philosophical thinking, turning philosophy into a force that affects the real world. The author calls for recognition of the productive forces of the Enlightenment, which appear as defenders of rational transparency and intellectual honesty. By rejecting the teleological context and focusing on formal aspects, Enlightenment ideas lead to a loss of connection with concrete reality and the purpose of actions. The last decades have seen a revival of the classical tradition, but there are difficulties in understanding the physical order and its relationship with the moral order. The author agrees with the criticism of the Enlightenment project, but opposes the rejection of any universalist project in general. Considering value pluralism as a result of the late Enlightenment, the author points out that the universalist project is opposed by various forms of relativism. It is in this context that tradition should resume its role.

References

Barbour, I. (2001). Ethics in the Age of Technology. [In Russian]. Moscow: BBI.

Bolz, N. (2004). Lust der Negation. Die Geburt der Kritischen Theorie aus dem Geist des Ressentiments. Merkur. Deutsche Zeitschrift für europäisches Denken, 9-10, 754-761.

Cassirer, E. (2004). Philosophy of the Enlightenment. [In Russian]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

Gössle, V. (2003). Practical Philosophy in the Modern World. [In Ukranian]. Kyiv: Libra.

Gray, J. (2003). Enlightenment's Wake. [In Russian]. Moscow: Praxis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203450635

Habermas, J. (1995). Democracy. Reason. Morality. [In Russian]. Moscow: Academia.

Habermas, J. (2001). Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. [In Ukranian]. Kyiv: Fourth Wave.

Horkheimer, M. (1987). Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. 5: „Dialektik der Aufklärung“ und Schriften 1940-1950. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

Locke, J. (1988). Works (Vol. 3). [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.

MacIntyre, A. (2000). After Virtue. [In Russian]. Yekaterinburg: Delovaya Kniga.

Maier, H. (1992). Nachdenken überdas Christentum. München: Herder.

Maier, H. (1999). Welt ohne Christentum - was wäre anders? Freiburg: Herder.

Messner, J. (1955). Das Naturrecht. Handbuch der Gesellschaftsethik, Staatsethik und Wirtschaftsethik. Innsbruck, & München: Tyrolia-Verlag.

Murphy, N., & Ellis, J. (2004). On the Moral Nature of the Universe. [In Russian]. Moscow: BBI.

Pico, A. (2004). Theology in the Age of Science. [In Russian]. Moscow: BBI.

Prychepiy, Y. (Ed.). (2002). Classics of Political Thought from Plato to Max Weber. [In Ukranian]. Kyiv: Tandem.

Ranovich, A. B. (1990). Primary Sources on the History of Early Christianity. [In Russian] Moscow: Izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury.

Scheler, M. (1999). Resentment in the Structure of Morals. [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Spaemann, R. (1993). Glück und Wohlwollen. Versuch über Ethik. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Taylor, C. (2005). The Sources of the Self. [In Ukranian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

Voytyla, K. (1991). Foundations of Ethics. Questions of Philosophy, 1, 29-59. [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967290459

Downloads

Abstract views: 56

Published

2005-06-27

How to Cite

Baumeister, A. (2005). The idea of modern and the Western tradition. Article 2. Sententiae, 12(1), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent12.01.152

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>