Discussion Topics in the History of the Development of Immanuel Kant’s Third «Critique»

Keywords: Kant, Critique of Judgment, aesthetics

Abstract

This paper deals with the so-called “external history” of the origin of Critique of the power of judgment that is based primarily on the philosopher’s correspondence in the period between May 1787 and October 1789. Two letters from Kant to Reinhold (28.12.1787 and 12.05.1789) as well as modifications in the interpretation of the term “aesthetics” in the first Critique (KrVA 22, B 35-36) are crucial for the evolution of the project Critique of Taste in the book Critique of the Power of Judgment. Special attention was paid to the debate between some modern scholars and editors about the importance of the reports on ‘Grundlegung’ / ‘Grundlage’ of Critique of Taste in the initial phase of work on the text. However, the available evidence does not allow us to reconstruct the “internal history” of the development of Kant’s thought during the period of writing the third Critique. Some modern scholars try to establish other objective criteria for this kind of reconstruction by identification in the text of Critique direct or hidden hints or citations to the literature of the 18th century. The author considers that the use of so-called “reflections” from the philosopher’s manuscript heritage, which can be seen as the formation and development of certain concepts of Kant’s theory, can be fruitful. The well-known problem of dating the reflections can be partially solved if terminus a quo will be not the published works, but Kant’s lectures on anthropology and logic taught at that time.

Author Biography

Vitali Terletsky, Research Institute of Ukrainian Studies

PhD in Philosophy, deputy director

References

Breitenbach, A. (2018). The Beauty of Science without the Science of Beauty: Kant and the Rationalists on the Aesthetics of Cognition. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56(2), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2018.0024

Buek, O. (1922). Immanuel Kants Werke. (Bd. V). Berlin: B. Cassirer.

Cassirer, E. (1921). Kants Leben und Lehre. Berlin: B. Cassirer.

Erdmann, B. (1884). Einleitung des Herausgeber. In B. Erdmann (Hrsg.), Immanuel Kant’s Kritik der Urteilskraft. (S. xiv-xlii). Leipzig: Voss.

Frank, M. (1990). Kants Reflexionen zur Ästhetik: zur Werkgeschichte der Kritik der ästhetischen Urteilskraft. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 175(4), 552-580.

Giordanetti, P., & Stark, W. (2000). Band 5: Kritik der Urteilskraft. Kant-Studien, 91 (s1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2000.91.s1.35

Guyer, P. (2000). Editor’s introduction. In I. Kant, Critique of the power of judgment (p. xiii-lii). (P. Guyer, & E. Matthews). New York: Cambridge UP.

Höffe, O. (1992). Immanuel Kant. München: Beck.

Irrlitz, G. (2015). Kant-Handbuch. Leben und Werk. Stuttgart: Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05432-6

Kant I. (1900 sqq). Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg. von der Preußischen (Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bd. I sqq.). Berlin: Reimer (Walter de Gruyter).

Kant, I. (1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. (J. Timmermann Hrsg.). Hamburg: Meiner. https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2112-4

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of Pure Reason. (I. Burkovsky, Trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Universe Press.

Kant, I. (2004). Critique of Practical Reason. (I. Burkovsky, Trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Universe Press.

Klemme, H. F. (2006). Einleitung. In I. Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft (S. xvii-ci). (H. F. Klemme, Hrsg). Hamburg: Meiner.

Kuehn, M. (2001). Kant. A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050433

Kumar, A. (2018). Kant and the Harmony of the Faculties: A Non-Cognitive Interpretation. Kantian Review, 23(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415417000358

McQuillan, J. C. (2017). Kant on the Science of Aesthetics and the Critique of Taste. Kant Yearbook, 9(1), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2017-0006

Röd, W. (2006). Philosophie der Neuzeit 3. Kritische Philosophie von Kant bis Schopenhauer. München: Beck.

Stark, W. (1993). Nachforschungen zu Briefen und Handschriften Immanuel Kants. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Vorländer, K. (1922). Einleitung des Herausgebers. In I. Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft (S. ix-xxxviii). Leipzig: Meiner.

Windelband, W. (1913) Einleitung. In I. Kant, Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg. von der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bd. V, S. 512-527). Berlin: Reimer.

Published
2018-12-13
How to Cite
Terletsky, V. (2018). Discussion Topics in the History of the Development of Immanuel Kant’s Third «Critique». Sententiae, 37(2), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.02.049
Section
ARTICLES