FROM «ROZMYSLY» TO «MEDITATION»: CONTEMPORARY RESEACH ON CARTESIANISM AND UKRAINIAN HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
AbstractIn present article shown views of advanced historians of phylosophy of XX century, that investigated Dekart’s “Meditations”. Described the stages of Dekart’s metaphysics formation, the main role of “Meditations” in this process and imperfectionof metaphysics science in IV part of “Discussions about method”. Considered the hypothesis of Zh.L. Maryon about status of “Meditations” as trial to present more clear and essential answer to the insightful critics of “Discourse”. Have been shown the features of literature style of meditation and character of including it’s in the phylosophycal text by Dekart; however, it was shown that goals of Dekart’s apologetics, as well as understanding by phylosopher himself it’s limited character. Was analized correlation of Latin and Franch “Meditation” texts and recognized the necessity of them both for more effective studing of it’s authors view. Justified the conceptual approach for the translation of Latin and Franch texts and were offered the updated system of ukrainian terms analogues. References
How to Cite
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).