Вітґенштайн та феноменологія: контроверзи французької інтерпретації

Oxana Yosypenko

doi:10.31649/sent40.03.068

Authors

Oxana Yosypenko Hr. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-4788

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.03.068

Keywords:

reception, philosophical field, phenomenology, ordinary language philosophy, linguistic phenomenology

Abstract

The author of the article focuses on the matter of Wittgenstein's philosophy reception in France. The reception of Wittgenstein's philosophy was quite late and led to different, sometimes opposite interpretations of his thought, even among French analytical philosophers. Applying a sociological approach to the problem of reception, the author identifies factors that hindered the penetration of the ideas of analytical philosophy in France, including the powerful institutionalization of philosophy in France with its inherent traditionalism and conservatism, fully expressed national character of French philosophy, as well as the extremely polemical character of French analytical philosophy, the transformation of the choice of this tradition of philosophizing into an ethical and political choice. These factors are illustrated by an analysis of Wittgenstein's conflicting interpretation of Jacques Bouveresse and Sandra Laugier. If the first creates an image of Wittgenstein as Anti-Husserl, blaming the phenomenologist for ignoring ordinary language, the second proposes a phenomenological reading of Wittgenstein's ideas using the philosophy of ordinary language. The article shows how opposing interpretations of Wittgenstein's philosophy reproduce the internal conflicts of the French philosophical field.

Author Biography

Oxana Yosypenko, Hr. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Senior Research Fellow

References

Austin, J. L. (1962a). Sens and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Austin, J. L. (1962b). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées. Actes de la recherche en siences sociales, 145, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.145.0003

Bourdieu, P. (2003). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil.

Bouveresse, J. (1987). Le mythe de l’intériorité. Paris: Minuit.

Bouveresse, J. (1991). La philosophie, la psychologie et pseudo-sience. Paris: Edition de l’Eclat.

Bouveresse, J. (1992). Sur quelques conséquences indésirables du pragmatisme. In J. P. Cometti (Ed.), Lire Rorty (pр. 43-54). Paris: Edition de l’Eclat.

Chauviré, Ch. (2001). Pourquoi moraliser les normes cognitives? Cités, 5(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.3917/cite.005.0087

Descombes, V. (2013). Exercices d’humanité. Paris: Les Petits Platons.

Engel, P. (1989). Continental insularity: Contemporary French analytical philosophy. In A. P. Griffith (Ed.), Contemporary French Philosophy (рp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628733.002

Frege, G. (1971). Sens et dénotation. In G. Frege, Ecrits logiques et philosophiques (pp. 102-126). Paris: Seuil.

Granel, G. (1968). Le Sens du temps et de la perception chez E. Husserl. Paris: Gallimard.

Joas, H. (1993). Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Laugier, S. (2001). Quel avenir pour la philosophie analytique en France? Cités, 5(1), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.3917/cite.005.0139

Laugier, S. (2002). Wittgenstein et la science: au-delà des mythologies. In P. Wagner (Ed.), Les philosophes et la science (1-9). Paris: Gallimard.

Laugier, S. (2004). Aspect, sens et perception: l’idée de phenomenologie linguistique. In J. Benoist, & S. Laugier. (Eds.), Husserl et Wittgenstein. De la description de l’expérience à la phénoménologie linguistique (рр. 211-241). Hildesheim [etc.]: Olms.

Pudal, R. (2011). Enjeux et usages du pragmatisme en France (1880–1920). Revue française de sociologie, 52(4), 747-775. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.524.0747

Wittgenstein L. (1994). Remarques sur la philosophie de la psychologie, vol. II (Ed. bilingue. Trad. de l’allemand par G. Granel). Mauvezin : TER.

Wittgenstein, L. (1964). Philosophische Bemerkungen. Blackwell: Oxford.

Wittgenstein, L. (1984). Remarques mêlées. Mauvezin: TER.

Wittgenstein, L. (1994). Remarques sur la philosophie de la psychologie. Ed. bilingue (vol. 2). (G. Granel, Trad.). Mauvezin: TER.

Wittgenstein, L. (1995a). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. [In Ukrainian]. In L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Philosophical investigations (рр. 22-86). Kyiv: Osnovy.

Wittgenstein, L. (1995b). Philosophical investigations. [In Ukrainian]. In L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Philosophical investigations (рр. 87-310). Kyiv: Osnovy.

Yosypenko, O. (2012). From Language of Philosophy to Philosophy of Language. The Problem of Language in French Philosophy in the Seconde Half of 20th - beginning of 21th Century. [In Ukranian]. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center of spiritual culture.

Yosypenko, S. (2020). Reception and influence in the history of philosophy: an approach to the problem. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska dumka, (2), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.02.006