Між свободою і залежністю: філософія «в» традиції чи, може, за її межами?

Viktor Kozlovskyi

doi:10.31649/sent44.03.143

Authors

Viktor Kozlovskyi National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8302-3977

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent44.03.143

Keywords:

freedom of philosophising, Ukrainian philosophical tradition, nation, belated nation, state, language, polyglossia

Abstract

The article explores the possibility of the Ukrainian national philosophical tradition in the global world. The author justifies an approach to this tradition based on the following theses: 1) this tradition is constituted fully, rather than fragmentarily, with the emergence of the Ukrainian state; 2) the war has significantly intensified the need for self-determination in Ukrainian philosophizing; 3) the national tradition is enabled by the Ukrainian language and its conceptual resources, which determine the formation of the disciplinary structure of Ukrainian philosophy, as well as the diversity of currents and directions for researching contemporary issues; 4) an important part of Ukrainian philosophy is the phenomenon of philosophy in Ukraine, which must exist not as a negation or confrontation with the national philosophical tradition, but in a modality of interaction, discussion, and dialogue. All traditions must preserve freedom of philosophical expression.

Author Biography

Viktor Kozlovskyi, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy

PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies

References

Croce, Б. (1929). A History of Italy,1871-1915. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Garin, E. (2008). History of Italian Philosophy. Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401205221

Haller, R. (1979). Studien zur österreichischen Philosophie: Variationen über ein Thema. Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004458116

Hösle, V. (2013). Eine kurze Geschichte der deutschen Philosophie. Rückblick auf den deutschen Geist. München: Beck. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406648656

Khoma, O. (2024). Tradition and Polyglossia. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 43(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.087

Panych, O. (2024). National philosophy and national philosophizing. [In Ukrainian]. In B. Cassin, & K. Sigov (Eds.), European dictionary of philosophies: Ukrainian context. Lexicon of untranslatables (Vol.5, pp. 101-103). Kyiv: Duh i Litera.

Plessner, H. (1965). Die verspätete Nation Über die politische Verführbarkeit bürgerlichen Geistes. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Plessner, H. (1985). Holland und die Philosophie. In H. Plessner. Gesammelte Schriften. IX. Schriften zur Philosophie (SS. 373-383). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Proleiev, S. (2025). Tradition in the Context of Philosophical Work. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 44(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent44.01.062

Wolff, Сh. (1740). Philosophia rationalis sive Logica methodo scientifica pertractata, et ad usum scientiarum atque vitae aptata. Praemittitur discursus praeliminaris de Philosophia in genere. Frankfurt; Leipzig: Prostat in officina libraria Rengeriana.

Yosypenko, S. (2014). National philosophic traditions as an object of reflection in the field of the history of philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 30(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent30.01.052

Yosypenko, S. (2024). Ukrainian language. [In Ukrainian]. In B. Cassin, & K. Sigov (Eds.), European dictionary of philosophies: Ukrainian context. Lexicon of untranslatables (Vol. 5, pp. 79-110). Kyiv: Duh i Litera.