Language as a Way to Cognition (Plato’s “Cratylus” in Ukrainian Translation)

Keywords: language, conventionalism, latinization, translation, ethymology

Abstract

The translator of the first Ukrainian version of Plato’s Cratylus (see above, p. ..) indicates the difficulties in translating the dialogue, emphasizing the external and internal aspects of those difficulties. The external aspect consists in the different etymology of Greek and Ukrainian words, and the internal one lays in the problem of choice between “Latinization” and “Ukrainization” of the translated text. The author made one of his translation principles to avoid excessive Latinization and justifies his decision.

Author Biography

Pavlo Sodomora, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University

doctor of sciences in philosophy, Head of Department of Latin and Foreign Languages

References

Albrecht, M., & Engel, E. J. (Eds.). (2000). Moses Mendelssohn im Spannungsfeld der Aufklärung. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.

Altmann, A. (1973). Moses Mendelssohn. A Biographical Study. Alabama: Alabama UP.

Arkush, A. (1994). Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Bernardini, P. L., & Lucci, D. (2012). The Jews, Instructions for Use. Four Eighteenth-Century Projects for the Emancipation of European Jews. Boston: Academic Studies Press.

Bernstein, J. A. (2014). The Theological-Political Problem in Leo Strauss’s Writings on Moses Mendelssohn. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 22(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341256

Breuer, E., & Sorkin, D. (Eds.). (2018). Moses Mendelssohn's Hebrew Writings. Yale: Yale UP.

Diamond, J. A. & Hughes A. W. (Eds.). (2012). Encountering the Medieval in Modern Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.

Ducheyne, S. (Ed.). (2017). Reassessing the Radical Enlightenment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613642

Feiner, S. (2004). The Jewish Enlightenment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Feiner, S. (2011). The Origins of Jewish Secularization in Eighteenth-Century Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Goldenbaum, U. (1996). Mendelssohns philosophischer Einstieg in die schönen Wissenschaften. Zu einer ästhetischen Rezeption Spinozas. In M. Fontius, & W. Schneiders (Eds.). Die Philosophie und die Belles-Lettres. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Gottlieb, M. (2003). The ambiguity of reason: Mendelssohn's writings on Spinoza. PhD dissertation. Indiana University.

Gottlieb, M. (2009). Counter-Enlightenment in a Jewish Key: Anti-Maimonideanism in Nineteenth-Century Orthodoxy. In J. T. Robinson (Ed.). The Cultures of Maimonideanism New Approaches to the History of Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.

Gottlieb, M. (2011). Faith and Freedom. Moses Mendelssohn's Theological-Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398946.001.0001

Gottlieb, M., & Manekin, Ch. H. (Eds.). (2015). Moses Mendelssohn: Enlightenment, Religion, Politics, Nationalism. Bethesda, Maryland: University Press of Maryland.

Hasselhoff, G. K. (2009). Manuel Joel and the Neo-Maimonidean Discovery of Kant. In J. T. Robinson (Ed.). The Cultures of Maimonideanism New Approaches to the History of Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.

Hippler, Th. (2008). Spinoza et l’histoire. Studia Spinozana, 16, 155-176.

Hippler, Th. (2012). L’éthique de l’historien spinoziste: Histoire et raison chez Spinoza. Astérion. Philosophie, Histoire des idées, pensée politique, 10. https://doi.org/10.4000/asterion.2307

Kohler, G. Y. (2009). Maimonides and Ethical Monotheism: The Influence of the Guide of the Perplexed on German Reform Judaism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century. In J. T. Robinson. (Ed.). The Cultures of Maimonideanism New Approaches to the History of Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.

Kohler, G. Y. (2012). Reading Maimonides' Philosophy in 19th Century Germany. The Guide to Religious Reform. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4035-8

Mendelssohn, M. (1972). Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Band 14: Hebräische Schriften I. (H. Borodianski (Bar-Dayan), Hrsg.). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann.

Meyer, M. (1972). The Origins of the Modern Jew: Jewish Identity and European Culture in Germany, 1749-1824. Detroit: Wayne State UP.

Munk, R. (ed.). (2011). Moses Mendelssohn's Metaphysics and Aesthetics. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2451-8

Pollok, A. (2009). Facetten des Menschen. Zur Anthropologie Moses Mendelssohns. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Porter, R. S., & Teich, M. (Eds.). (1981). The Enlightenment in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561283

Rosenthal, M. A. (2008a). Spinoza and the philosophy of history. In Ch. Huenemann (Ed.). Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 111-127). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Rosenthal, M. A. (2008b). Spinoza, history, and jewish modernity. In Ch. H. Manekin, & R. Eisen (Eds.). Philosophers and the Jewish Bible (pp. 113-130). Bethseda: University of Maryland Press.

Sacks, E. (2017). Moses Mendelssohn's Living Script: Philosophy, Practice, History, Judaism. Bloomington, & Indianapolis: Indiana UP.

Schweid, E. (2011). History of Modern Jewish Religious Philosophy. Volume 1: The Period of the Enlightenment. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207332.i-362

Schweid, E. (2015). History of Modern Jewish Religious Philosophy. Volume 2: The Birth of Jewish Historical Studies and the Modern Jewish Religious Movements. Leiden: Brill.

Septimus, B. (1982). Hispano-Jewish Culture in Transition: The Career and Controversies of Ramah. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard UP.

Septimus, B. (1983). Nahmanides and the Andalusian Tradition. In I. Twersky (Ed.). Rabbi Moses Nahmanides (Ramban): Explorations in His Religious and Literary Virtuosity (pp. 11-34). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard UP.

Sorkin, D. (1991). Transformation of German Jewry. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Sorkin, D. (1996). Moses Mendelssohn and the Religious Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Sorkin, D. (1999). The Mendelssohn Myth and its Method. New German Critique, 77, 7-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/488519

Sorkin, D. (2004). Early Haskalah. In D. Sorkin, & S. Feiner (Eds.). New perspectives on the Haskalah (pp. 9-26). London: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.

Sorkin, D. (2008). The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton UP

Strauss, L. (1997). Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity: Essays and Lectures in Modern Jewish Thought. (K. H. Green, Ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Vogt, W. (2005). Moses Mendelssohns Beschreibung der Wirlichkeit menschlichen Erkennens. Wuerzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.

Withers, Ch. W. J. (2007). Placing the Enlightenment: Thinking Geographically about the Age of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226904078.001.0001

Yaffe, M. D. (Ed.). (2012). Leo Strauss on Moses Mendelssohn. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

Published
2018-12-13
How to Cite
Sodomora, P. (2018). Language as a Way to Cognition (Plato’s “Cratylus” in Ukrainian Translation). Sententiae, 37(2), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.02.159
Section
TRANSLATIONS: SUPPLEMENT