Russian identification. Nikolai Karamzin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent05.01.114Keywords:
Enlightenment, Romanticism, autocracy, historiosophy, nationalism, French RevolutionAbstract
The article is devoted to the evolution of Nikolai Karamzin's views, which largely illustrates the identification processes in Russia at the turn of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Even before writing the «History of the Russian State», Karamzin's views were in line with the trend of transition from a «servile» state to enlightened absolutism. In particular, the autocracy was to be based on law, the source of which should be the monarch himself. Under this system, the subject was not a slave but a citizen. However, after the defeat of enlightenment project , Karamzin began a research of Russian history, where he tried to find not a rational guidance, but something that could consolidate the nation – its spirit. All the ideologues of «Slavophilism» were brought up on Karamzin's «History». The author illustrates how Russian classicism gives way to romanticism, which «awakens» the national consciousness. Karamzin plays a significant role in this process: he provides the russian romantics with the necessary element without which Romanticism is impossible – tradition.
References
Berkovsky, N. Y. (Ed.). (1934). Literary Theory of German Romanticism: Documents. [In Russian]. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Pisatelei v Leningrade.
Crick, B. (1966). In Defence of Politics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Gukovsky, G. A. (1965). Pushkin and Russian Romantics. [In Russian]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura.
Karamzin, N. M. (1972). Letters of a Russian Traveler. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.
Karamzin, N. M. (1966). Complete Collection of Poems. [In Russian]. Leningrad: Sovetsky pisatel.
Musset, A. de (1970). Confession of a Child of the Century. [In Russian]. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura.
Pospelov, G. (1964). Can There Be Romanticism Without Romance? [In Russian]. Voprosy literatury, (9), 111-117.
Radichev, A. N. (1988). Selected Works. [In Russian]. Moscow: Pravda.
Shporlyuk, R. (1998). Communism and Nationalism: Karl Marx Versus Friedrich List. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy.
Toibin, I. M. (1980). Pushkin and Philosophical-Historical Thought in Russia at the Turn of 1820-1830. [In Russian]. Voronezh: Izdatel'stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.
Walicki, A. (1998). In the Captivity of Conservative Utopia: Structure and Transformations of Russian Slavophilism. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 40
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).