Revisionist-contextual reconstruction Marquis de Sade’s Philosophical “System”. Lloyd, H. M. (2019). Sade’s Philosophical System in its Enlightenment Context. Cham: Springer Nature; Palgrave Macmillan.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.01.191

Keywords:

discourse of sensibility, roman philosophique, affective self-cultivation, philosophical askesis

Abstract

The review identifies the components of H. M. Lloyd’s contextual intellectual reconstruction of Marquis de Sade’s philosophical system in the context of the Enlightenment. The fundamental importance of the Enlightenment discourse of sensibility, its influence on the theory of natural law and moral philosophy of the eighteenth century is established. The main stages of reconstruction of Sade’s “system” are demonstrated, namely: 1) philosophical context (ontology and epistemology) as a discourse of sensibility; 2) particularities of the “roman philosophique” as a genre; 3) the moral philosophy of the era and the Sade's response to it; 4) Sade’s theories of corporeal sensibility and affective self-cultivation, that isits philosophical askesis; 5) understanding of Sade in the context of the development of contemporary philosophy. It is noted that such reconstruction problematizes of the formal and substantive components of philosophical discourse in the academic environment.

Author Biography

Oleh Perepelytsia, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, professor of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy

References

Condillac, E. B. de. (1970). Traité des sensations. In E. B. De Condillac, Oeuvres complètes (T. III, pp. 1-327). Genève: Slatkine.

Cook, A., Curthoys, N., & Konishi, S. (2013). The Science and Politics of Humanity in the Eighteenth Century: An Introduction. In A. Cook, N. Curthoys, & S. Konishi (Eds), Representing the Human in the Age of Enlightenment (рp. 1-14). London: Pickering & Chatto.

Fouquet, H. (1765). Sensibilité, Sentiment (Médecine). In D. Diderot, & J. le R. D’Alembert (Eds.), Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, par une Société de Gens de lettres (T. 15: pp. 38-52). Paris: Briasson, David, Le Breton & Durand.

Gay, P. (1971). The Party of Humanity: Essays in the French Enlightenment. New York: Norton.

Helvétius, C. A. (1758). De L’Esprit. Paris: Durand.

Hénaff, M. (1999). Sade: The Invention of the Libertine Body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.cttts40k

Le Camus, A. (1769). Médecine de l’esprit. Paris: Chez Ganeau.

Lévesque de Pouilly, L.-J. (1747). Théorie des Sentimens Agréables. Genève: Barrillot, & Fils.

Marty, É. (2011). Pourquoi le XXe siècle a-t-il pris Sade au sérieux? Paris: Seuil. https://doi.org/10.3917/cite.047.0333

Meeker, N. (2014). Sade at the End of the World. In K. Parker, & N. Sclippa (Eds.), Sade’s Sensibilities (pp. 87-101). Lewisburg: Bucknell UP.

Nobus, D. (2017). The Law of Desire: On Lacan's 'Kant with Sade'. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55275-0

Onfray, M. (2014). La Passion de la méchanceté: sur un prétendu divin marquis. Paris: Autrement.

Perepelytsia, O. (2016a). Being and Enjoyment: from Descartes’ Subject of Cogito to Sade’s Subject of Imago. [In Ukrainian]. In Sententiae, 35(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent35.02.082

Perepelytsia, O. (2016b). Porno(u)topia of Marquis de Sade: “Philosophy in the Bedroom” vs “Symposium”. [In Ukrainian]. In Sententiae, 34(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent34.01.095

Sade, D. A. F. (1995). Justine ou les malheurs de la vertu. In D. A. F. Sade, Oeuvres (Vol. II, pp. 120-390). Paris: Gallimard.

Sade, D. A. F. (1998a). Juliette ou les prospérités du vice. In D. A. F. Sade, Oeuvres (Vol. III, pp. 179-1262). Paris: Gallimard.

Sade, D. A. F. (1998b). La Philosophie dans le boudoir, ou Les Instituteurs immoraux. In D. A. F. Sade, Oeuvres (Vol. III, pp. 1-178). Paris: Gallimard.

Sade, D. A. F. (2016). Philosophy in the Bedroom. Dialogues designed to educate young girls. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Komubuk.

St-Martin, A. (2010). De la médecine chez Sade: Disséquer la vie, narrer la mort. Paris: Champion.

Vila, A. C. (1998). Enlightenment and Pathology: Sensibility in the Literature and Medicine of Eighteenth-Century France. London: Johns Hopkins UP.

Zahurska, N. (2004). Epistola in Camera vs. Philosophy in the Bedroom. In D.-A.-F. de Sade, Letters of the Eternal Prisoner (pp. 5-66). [In Russian]. Moscow: Eksmo.

Downloads

Abstract views: 280

Published

2020-06-26

How to Cite

Perepelytsia, O. (2020). Revisionist-contextual reconstruction Marquis de Sade’s Philosophical “System”. Lloyd, H. M. (2019). Sade’s Philosophical System in its Enlightenment Context. Cham: Springer Nature; Palgrave Macmillan. Sententiae, 39(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.01.191

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.