Under the yoke of women: the Enlightenment's dialectics of the power of Nature and the power over Nature

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent12.01.104

Keywords:

Mind, Enlightenment, erotica, feminism

Abstract

The article is devoted to the criticism of the thesis about the female-feminist Enlightenment. The author analyzes the relationship between man, woman and nature in the context of domination. Under the influence of Rousseau's works, the author conducts a study of the social and natural in their correlation with the feminine-masculine. The author believes that the theory of female Enlightenment is a postmodern speculative discourse, and therefore has no historical validity.

References

Arsan, E. (1992). Emmanuela. [In Russian]. Kyiv: RIF Dzvin.

Deleuze, G. (1992). Masochism: Coldness and cruelty In G. Deleuze, Venus in Furs (pp. 189-313). [In Russian]. Moscow: RIK Culture.

Gapova, E., & Usmanova, A. (Eds.). (2000). Anthology of Gender Theory. [In Russian]. Minsk: Propilei.

Hin-Shun, Yan (1972-1973). Ancient Chinese Philosophy: Collection of Texts in Two Volumes. [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.

Lipovetsky, J. (2003). The Third Woman. The Unchanging and Shock of Femininity Foundations. [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1969). Treatises. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1981). Pedagogical Works: In 2 Volumes. [In Russian]. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Sloterdijk, P. (2002). Critique of Cynical Reason. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Tandem.

Spinoza, B. (1998). Selected Works. [In Russian]. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix.

Downloads

Abstract views: 105

Published

2005-06-27

How to Cite

Kuznetsov, V. (2005). Under the yoke of women: the Enlightenment’s dialectics of the power of Nature and the power over Nature. Sententiae, 12(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent12.01.104

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.