The Antinomies of the Freedom, or the Three Temptations of Dostoevsky

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22240/sent29.02.037

Keywords:

freedom, God-Man, Man-God, people the god-bearer, antinomy, the existential, being, meaning

Abstract

In this article the main theme of Dostoevsky – the freedom is analyzed. Researchers, who study the legacy of Dostoevsky, try to consider one or another aspect of his work as a more or less constant, complete system. Following the Russian tradition, they seek to record a "positive" Dostoevsky. The author believes that there is no such Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky put "cursed questions" not to get a final answer to them but merely for the process of questioning what actually means "living" them through. The author believes that the antinomy of freedom for Dostoevsky leaves open the problem of choosing between the Boholyudyna and Lyudyno-boh. The content of his works is studying their opposition within the human soul, which lasts throughout life. The process of choice, the arguments in favor of one or the other are more important for Dostoevsky than the final answer.

Author Biography

Ihor Nemchynov, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University

Doctor of sciences in philosophy, Professor, рrofessor at the Department of Philosophy,

References

Avramenko, R., Trepanier, L. (Eds.). (2013). Dostoevsky’s Political Thought. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Bakhtin, M. M. (2002). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. [In Russian]. In M. M. Bakhtin, Works in 7 vols. (Vol. 6, pp. 6-300). Moscow: Russian dictionaries; Languages of Slavic Cultures.

Berdyaev, N. A. (1990). The Russian Idea. [In Russian]. In Voprosy Filosofii, (2), 87-154.

Berdyaev, N. A. (2001). Dostoevsky. [In Russian]. Retrieved from http: In www.vehi.net/berdyaev/dostoevsky/index.html

Brodsky, I. A. (1992). Оn Dostoevsky. [In Russian]. In I. A. Brodsky, Watermark (pp. 72-77). Moscow: Slovo.

Bulgakov, S. N. (2001). The Russian tragedy. [In Russian]. Retrieved from http: In www.vehi.net/bulgakov/tragediya.html

Cherkasova, Е. (2009). Dostoevsky and Kant: Dialogues on Ethics. Amsterdam, & New York: Rodopi.

Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1989). Notes from Underground. [In Russian]. In F. M. Dostoyevsky, Works (Vol. 4, pp. 452-550). Leningrad: Nauka.

Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1990a). The Possessed. [In Russian]. In F. M. Dostoyevsky, Works (Vol. 7, pp. 7-672). Leningrad: Nauka.

Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1990b). The Raw Youth. [In Russian]. In F. M. Dostoyevsky, Works (Vol. 8, pp. 139-692). Leningrad: Nauka.

Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1991). The Brothers Karamazov, Parts І-ІІІ. [In Russian]. In F. M. Dostoyevsky, Works (Vol. 9, pp. 5-570). Leningrad: Nauka.

Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1995a). Pushkin. [In Russian]. In In F. M. Dostoyevsky, Works (Vol. 14, pp. 425-440). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1995b). The Dream of a Ridiculous Man. [In Russian]. In F. M. Dostoyevsky, Works (Vol. 14, pp. 120-137). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1996). Letter to N. D. Fonvizina. [In Russian]. In F. M. Dostoyevsky, Works (Vol. 15, pp. 95-98). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Evlampiev, I. I. (2000). The History of Russian Metaphysics in XIX-XX centuries. Russian philosophy in search of the absolute (Part I). [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteia.

Evlampiev, I. I. (2012). Philosophy of human of the creativity Dostoevsky (From early works to the «The Brothers Karamazov»). [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Russian Christianity Humanitarian Academy.

Florovsky, G. (1990). The religious theme in Dostoevsky [In Russian] In V. N. Borisov, A. B. Roginsky (Eds.), Оn Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky in Russian thought 1881-1931 years (pp. 386-390). Moscow: Kniga, 1990.

Frank, J. (2010). Dostoevsky: a writer in his time. Princeton: Princeton UP. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833412

Golosovker, J. E. (1963). Dostoyevsky and Kant. [In Russian]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House.

Hubben, W. (1997). Dostoevsky, Kierkegard, Nietzsche and Kafka. Scribner Book Company.

Jones, М. V. (1986). The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor: The Suppression of the Second Temptation and Dialogue with God. Dostoevsky Studies, 7, 123-134.

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of Pure Reason. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Universe.

Kroeker, Р. T., Ward, B. K. (2001). Remembering the End. Dostoevsky as Prophet to Modernity. Westview Press.

Matseyna, A. (1999). The Grand Inquisitor. [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteia.

Natov, N. (1987). The Ethical and Structural Significance of the Three Temptations in The Brothers Karamazov. Dostoevsky Studies, 8, 3-44.

Pattison, G. (2001). Freedom’s dangerous dialogue: reading Dostoevsky and Kierkegaard together. In G. Pattison, & D. O. Thompson (Eds.). Dostoevsky and the Christian Tradition (pp. 237-256). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge UP.

Rozanov, V. V. (1989). Dostoevsky and the Legend of the Grand Inquisitor [In Russian]. In V. V. Rozanov, Thoughts on literature (pp. 41-157). Moscow: Sovremennik.

Sandoz, Е. (2000). Political Apocalypse, A Study of Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor (2nd ed.). Willmington, Del.: ISI Books.

Scanlan, J. P. (2002). Dostoevsky the Thinker. Ithaca, & London: Cornell UP.

Downloads

Abstract views: 449

Published

2013-12-16

How to Cite

Nemchynov, I. (2013). The Antinomies of the Freedom, or the Three Temptations of Dostoevsky. Sententiae, 29(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent29.02.037

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.