Trends of modern Cartesianism: from substantial union to the theory of virtue. Reuter, M., & Svensson, F. (Eds.). (2019). Mind, Body, and Morality: New Perspectives on Descartes and Spinoza. Oxon: Routledge.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.01.140

Abstract

Review of Reuter, M., & Svensson, F. (Eds.). (2019). Mind, Body, and Morality: New Perspectives on Descartes and Spinoza. Oxon: Routledge.

Author Biography

Ryenat Shvets, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

undergraduate student at the Faculty of Philosophy

References

Adriaenssen, H.-T. (2017). Representation and Scepticism from Aquinas to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855102

Alanen, L. (2003). Descartes’s Concept of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020108

Alanen, L. (2004). Descartes and Elisabeth: A Philosophical Dialogue? In L. Alanen & C. Witt (Eds.), Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy (pp. 193-218). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2489-4_11

Bodnarchuk, L., & Sen’, A. (2014). Cottingam’s Conception of Descrates’s Trialism and Modern Discussions. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 30(1), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent30.01.196

Carriero, J. (2009). Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations. Princeton: Prince-ton UP. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833191

Cottingham, J. & Hacker, P. (eds.). (2010). Mind, Method, and Morality: Essays in Honour of An-thony Kenny. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Descartes, R. (1996). Œuvres (Vol. I-XI). (Ch. Adam & P. Tannery, Eds.). Paris: Vrin.

Khoma, O. (Ed.). (2021). Descartes' “Meditations” in the Mirror of Modern Interpretations. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Duh i Litera.

Khoma, O. (2020). Spinoza in the focus of national traditions. Stetter, J., & Ramond, C. (Eds.). (2019). Spinoza in 21st-century American and French philosophy: metaphysics, philosophy of mind, moral and political philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic. [In Ukrainian] Sen-tentiae, 39(2), 207–209. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.207

Marion, J.-L. (1991). Quelle est la métaphysique dans la méthode? In J.-L. Marion, Questions cartésiennes (pp. 37-73). Paris: PUF.

Melamed, Y. (2021). Spinoza on Causa Sui. In Y. Melamed (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Spinoza (pp. 116-125). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119538349.ch11

Reuter, M., & Svensson, F. (Eds.). (2019). Mind, Body, and Morality: New Perspectives on Des-cartes and Spinoza. Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202831

Sepetyi, D. (2018). Was Descartes a substance dualist? [In Ukrainian]. Actual Problems of Mind, (19), 36-63. https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i19.2069

Downloads

Abstract views: 355

Published

2023-04-30

How to Cite

Shvets, R. (2023). Trends of modern Cartesianism: from substantial union to the theory of virtue. Reuter, M., & Svensson, F. (Eds.). (2019). Mind, Body, and Morality: New Perspectives on Descartes and Spinoza. Oxon: Routledge. Sententiae, 42(1), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.01.140

Issue

Vol. 42 No. 1 (2023): SENTENTIAE

Section

NEW EDITIONS

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC