Conceptual conditions of (“) Monadology (”)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22240/sent28.01.199

Keywords:

Leibniz, monad, possible universes, palace of fates, сonfusion, biochemical predestination, irreducible complexity

Abstract

The article is an attempt to juxtapose the conceptual bases of work “Monadology” with monadology as one of the basic conceptions of Leibniz’s philosophy in general. “Monadology” begins with the definition of monad as a simple substance. But is this definition the beginning of monadology as a theory? In § 53 of “Monadology” Leibniz pointed out that in the ideas of God there is an infinite number of possible universes, and only one of them can be actual. So, the choice of the world and the ideas of possible universes both conceptually precede monade as a simple substance. The article analyses these preconditions via Leibniz’s concepts of “palace of fates” (palais de destinées) and “confusion”. The consideration of these concepts is realized in comparison with some scientific theories, including Dean Kenyon’s theory of biochemical predestination and Michael Behe’s theory of irreducible complexity.

Author Biography

Pavlo Bartusyak, Vinnitsia National Technical University

Applicant for PhD in philosophy at the Department of Philosophy

References

Baumeister, A. (2012). Leibniz’s pluralistic ontology: on crossing of Scholastic and Modern. [In Ukrainian]. Totallogy. Post-Classical Researches, 28, 123-132.

Behe, M. (1996). Darwin’s Black Box. New York: Free Press.

Darwin, Ch. (2006). On the Origin of Species by Means of natural selection. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Pyramida.

Deleuze, G. (1988). Le Pli. Leibniz et le Baroque. Paris: Minuit.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Capitalisme et chizophrénie: Vol. 2. Mille plateaux. Paris: Minuit.

Fichant, M. (2005). Constitution du concept de Monade. In E. Pasini (Ed.), La Monadologie de Leibniz. Genèse et contexte (pp. 30-54). Milano: Mimesis.

Futch, M. J. (2008). Leibniz’s metaphysics of Time and Space. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8237-5

Heidegger, M. (1983). Einführung in die Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

Kenyon, D., & Steinman, G. (1969). Biochemical predestination. New York, & London: Mcgraw-Hill.

Leibniz, G. W. (1880). Discours de métaphysique. In G. W. Leibniz, Die Philosophischen Schriften (Bd. IV, S. 427-463). (C. Gerhardt, Hrsg.). Berlin: Weidmann.

Leibniz, G. W. (1882). Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain. In G. W. Leibniz, Die Philosophischen Schriften (Bd. V, S. 39-509). (C. Gerhardt, Hrsg.). Berlin : Weidmann.

Leibniz, G. W. (1885). Essais de theodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal. In G. W. Leibniz, Die Philosophischen Schriften (Bd. VI, S. 21-462). (C. Gerhardt, Hrsg.). Berlin: Weidmann.

Leibniz, G. W. (1985). Theodicy. (A. Farrer, Ed., E. M. Huggard, Trans.). La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.

Leibniz, G. W. (2008). Principles of Nature and Grace Based on Reason. (P. Bartusyak, Trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska dumka, (4), 25-43.

Mercer, C. (2004). Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Pasini, E. (2005). La Monadologie: histoire de naissance. In E. Pasini (Ed.), La Monadologie de Leibniz. Genèse et contexte (pp. 85-122). Milano: Mimesis.

Perec, G. (1978). La Vie mode d’emploi. Paris: Hachette.

Savile, A. (2000). Leibniz and the Monadology. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Abstract views: 392

Published

2013-06-16

How to Cite

Bartusyak, P. (2013). Conceptual conditions of (“) Monadology (”). Sententiae, 28(1), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent28.01.199

Issue

Section

TRANSLATIONS: SUPPLEMENT

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.