Enlightenment and Mediation (Reflections on the Book “Mediums of the Enlightenment: Obscene Deviations” by Oleh Perepelytsia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent34.01.161Keywords:
Enlightenment, mediation, medium, language, sex, moneyAbstract
The author analyzes the concept of Enlightenment as described in the monograph “Mediums of the Enlightenment: obscene deviation” by Oleh Perepelytsia. The author notes that O. Perepelytsia considers Enlightenment as a medial phenomenon and identifies three mediums of the Enlightenment: language, sex and money.
The author further notes that the main drawback of O. Perepelitsi’s concept is too broad understanding of the Enlightenment. Also O. Perepelytsia puts universal mediums in the stead of specific mediums of Enlightenment.
Sex fulfilled its intermediary functions even in primitive society, and continues to do that today. Sexuality is very important for the European Enlightenment, but in the Chinese Enlightenment it does not play any special role. However, even when we talk about Europe, it is necessary to find out the conditions under which sex becomes a medium of the Enlightenment. Money for Enlightenment is not a medium, but one of the factors that determine the state of human nature before it is subjected to education and training. Language is a full-fledged medium only in Chinese Enlightenment. In Europe there is a trend towards the transformation of language into the object of education. To prove this thesis the author compares the views of Locke, Plato and Confucius.References
Fung Yu-Lan. (1998). A short history of Chinese philosophy. [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Eurasia.
Kobzev, A. I. (2002). Philosophy of Chinese Neo-Confucianism. [In Russian]. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura.
Kuznetsov, V. G. (2014). Enlightenment and Ontology. Autochthonous Enlightenments: China. [In Russian]. Sententiae, 30(1), 5-22.
Malyavin, V. V. (2007). Confucius. [In Russian]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya.
Marx, K. (1968). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. In K. Marx & F. Engels. Werke (Ergänzungsband, 1. Teil, S. 465-588). Berlin (DDR): Dietz Verlag.
Perepelitsa, O. (2014). Mediums of the Enlightenment: obscene deviation. [In Russian]. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
Plato. (1990-1994). Works in 4 vol. [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.
Semenenko, I. I. (1987). Aphorisms of Confucius. [In Russian]. Moscow: MGU.
Siskin, C., & Warner, W. (2010). This is Enlightenment: An Invitation in the Form of an Argument. In C. Siskin, & W. Warner (Eds.). This is Enlightenment (pp. 1-33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226761466.001.0001
The Analects. [In Russian]. (1972). In Yang Hin-shun, (Ed.). A Philosophy of Ancient Chine. Anthology in 2 vol. (Vol. 1, pp. 139-174). Moscow: Mysl.
Locke, J. (1823). The Works in ten volumes. London: Thomas Tegg.
Zavadskaya, Е. V. (1982). Mission of the Word in “The Analects”. [In Russian]. In L. P. Delyusin (Ed.). Confucianism in China: Theory and Practice (pp. 36-45). Moscow: Nauka.
Kobzev, A. I. (2002). Philosophy of Chinese Neo-Confucianism. [In Russian]. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura.
Kuznetsov, V. G. (2014). Enlightenment and Ontology. Autochthonous Enlightenments: China. [In Russian]. Sententiae, 30(1), 5-22.
Malyavin, V. V. (2007). Confucius. [In Russian]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya.
Marx, K. (1968). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. In K. Marx & F. Engels. Werke (Ergänzungsband, 1. Teil, S. 465-588). Berlin (DDR): Dietz Verlag.
Perepelitsa, O. (2014). Mediums of the Enlightenment: obscene deviation. [In Russian]. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
Plato. (1990-1994). Works in 4 vol. [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.
Semenenko, I. I. (1987). Aphorisms of Confucius. [In Russian]. Moscow: MGU.
Siskin, C., & Warner, W. (2010). This is Enlightenment: An Invitation in the Form of an Argument. In C. Siskin, & W. Warner (Eds.). This is Enlightenment (pp. 1-33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226761466.001.0001
The Analects. [In Russian]. (1972). In Yang Hin-shun, (Ed.). A Philosophy of Ancient Chine. Anthology in 2 vol. (Vol. 1, pp. 139-174). Moscow: Mysl.
Locke, J. (1823). The Works in ten volumes. London: Thomas Tegg.
Zavadskaya, Е. V. (1982). Mission of the Word in “The Analects”. [In Russian]. In L. P. Delyusin (Ed.). Confucianism in China: Theory and Practice (pp. 36-45). Moscow: Nauka.
Downloads
-
PDF (Російська)
Downloads: 211
Abstract views: 562
Published
2016-06-16
How to Cite
Kuznetsov, V. (2016). Enlightenment and Mediation (Reflections on the Book “Mediums of the Enlightenment: Obscene Deviations” by Oleh Perepelytsia). Sententiae, 34(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent34.01.161
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Sententiae
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
