Evidentiality as Fundamental Problem of «Clear Scienсes» (Descartes and Husserl at the Sources of Conscience)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent03.01.030

Abstract

Because methodical doubt is a process of demarcation of scientific (clear) and non-scientific constructions, then in this process Descartes affirmed truly neo-positivistic principle. Descartes` rational transformation of thinking is usage methods of mechanical sciences to «sciences about spirit» attaching to them also natural status. But Descartes had not noticed that scientific obviousnesses with time turns into dogmas. That is why Husserl offered to describe phenomena after riching «epoche» about natural-scientific beliefs. Search of pretheoretical grounds of obviousness has led to loss of clarity and of its apodictic weight. Because «obviousnesses» were always founded on historico-philosophical invariant, then needed either reconsider Descartes «technique» or kernel of decomposition and reconstruct «laws of thinking» in respect to it.

References

Apel, К.-О. (1996). Grounding of the responsibility ethics. [In Ukrainian]. In А. М. Yermolenko (Ed. & Comp.), Primary sources of communicative philosophy (pp. 46-59). Kyiv: Lybid.

Descartes, R. (1989). Works in 2 vol. [In Russian]. (Vol. 2). Moscow: Mysl.

Furs, V. (1996). Communicative-theoretical modification of philosophical rationality in conception of Jurgen Habermas. [In Russian]. In А. Usmanov (Ed.), Philosophy of the postmodern epoch (pp. 98-116). Minsk: Ph. Krasiko-print LLP.

Herrmann, F. (2000). Notion of phenomenology in Heidegger and Husserl. [In Russian]. Minsk: Propylaea.

Husserl, E. (1994). Philosophy as rigorous science. [In Russian]. Novocherkassk: Saguna.

Husserl, E. (1997). Logical Investigations. [In Russian]. Logos, (9), 25-41.

Molchanov, V. (1997). Loneliness of consciousness and communicativity of a sign. [In Russian]. Logos, (9), 5-24.

Molchanov, V. (1999). Premises and premiselessness of the phenomenological Philosophy. [In Russian]. Logos, (10), 16-28.

Reale, G., & Antiseri, D. (1997). Western philosophy from beginnings to our days in 4 vol. [In Russian]. (Vol. 3). Saint-Petersburg: TC Petropolis LLP.

Downloads

Abstract views: 36

Published

2001-06-25

How to Cite

Okorokov, V. (2001). Evidentiality as Fundamental Problem of «Clear Scienсes» (Descartes and Husserl at the Sources of Conscience). Sententiae, 3(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent03.01.030

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2001): SENTENTIAE

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC