Logic, Mathematics or Metaphysics: and Yet, is the Leibniz’ Conception Enough Well-Grounded?

  • Viktor Okorokov Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University
Keywords: epistemology, metaphysics, logic, math, critical philosophy, Kant, Leibniz

Abstract

Whether Leibniz was a metaphysicist or a dogmatic philosopher? We argue that S. Secundant in his book 1) convincingly proved that the epistemology of Leibniz played a leading role in relation to his metaphysics; 2) described in detail its critical foundation. The significant scientific achievement of S. Secunant is the analysis of the differences in the grounds of Leibniz’ epistemology and Kant's critique, as well as evidence of a more profound nature of the tasks and normative bases the first of them.

Author Biography

Viktor Okorokov, Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University
Doctor of sciences in philosophy, Professor, professor at the Department of philosophy,

References

Badiou, A., & Tarby, F. (2010). La Philosophie et l'Événement: entretiens: suivis d'une courte introduction à la philosophie d'Alain Badiou. Meaux: Germina.

Deleuze, G. (1988). Le pli: Leibniz et le Baroque. Paris: Minuit.

Descartes. R. (1989). Discourse on the Method. [In Russian]. In R. Descartes, Works: in 2 vol. (Vol. 1, pp. 250-296). Moscow: Mysl.

Habermas, J. (1988). Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Leibniz, G. W. (1983). New Essays on Human Understanding. [In Russian]. In G. W. Leibniz, Works: in 4 vol. (Vol. 2, pp. 47-545). Moscow: Mysl.

Locke, J. (1985). Essay Concerning Human Understanding. [In Russian]. In J. Locke, Works: in 3 vol. (Vol. 1-2). Moscow: Mysl.

Secundant, S. G. (2013). Leibniz’ Epistemology in its normative and critical bases. [In Russian]. Odessa: Pechatnyi Dom.
Published
2013-12-16
How to Cite
Okorokov, V. (2013). Logic, Mathematics or Metaphysics: and Yet, is the Leibniz’ Conception Enough Well-Grounded?. Sententiae, 29(2), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent29.02.204
Section
REVIEWS