Conceptuality of the Intuition: Sellars сompletes Kant’s Epistemology

Keywords: Kant, consciousness, intention, intuition, sensibility, modal logic, perceptual taking, imagination, synthesis

Abstract

The article deals with Wilfrid Sellars’ interpretation of Kant’s concept of intuition. The author demonstrates that Sellars’ two-aspect view follows both basic Kantian distinction between the noumenal and the phenomenal, and his division of the cognitive capacities. Meanwhile, on the ground of unifying intensional semantics and productive imagination, Sellars completes Kantian model of cognition by eliminating the sharp opposition between passive sensibility and active reason. Thus Sellars makes the mechanism of transcendental logic unified in the context of modal logic. The author argues that such approach would be successful if guided by a principal rejection of the idea of pure synthesis as well as the hard version of apriorism. In general, the conceptualistic-and-categorial treatment of intuition helps to (a) overcome contradictory predicates problem, (b) bring together Critical philosophy and Scientific Realism. Also, using the Kantian doctrine of double affection, it (c) makes possible to describe the theory of meaning as a part of the theory of truth.

Author Biography

Vyacheslav Tsyba, Nizhyn Gogol State University
PhD, Lecturer, Department of History and Law Sciences

References

Allison, H. E. (1983). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale UP.

Chisholm, R., & Sellars, W. (1957). Intentionality and the Mental: Chisholm-Sellars Correspondence on Intentionality. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. II, pp. 521-539). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Haag, J. (2012). Some Kantian Themes in Wilfrid Sellars’s Philosophy. Paradigmi. Rivista di Critica Filosofica, 30(1), 111-126.

Kant, I. (1974). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Kant, I. (2005). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. (V. Terletsky, Ed. & Trans.). [in Ukrainian]. Kiev: PPS-2002.

McDowell, J. (2009). Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard UP.

Rosenberg, J. F. (2007). Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Images. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Sellars, W. (1963). Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing.

Sellars, W. (1968). Science and Metaphysics. Variations on Kantian Themes. London: Routledge; New York: Humanities Press.

Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. (R. B. Brandom, Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.

Sellars, W. (2002a). Kant and pre-Kantian themes (P. Amaral, Ed.). Atascadero: Ridgeview Pub.

Sellars, W. (2002b). The Role of the Imagination in Kant’s Theory of Experience. In J. F. Sicha, (Ed.), Kant’s Transcendental Metaphysics: Sellars’ Cassirer Lecture Notes and Other Essays. Atascadero: Ridgeview Pub.

Stephenson, A. (2015). Kant on the Object-Dependence of Intuition and Hallucination. The Philosophical Quarterly, 65(260), 486-508. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu100

Tolley, C. (2013). The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach. Kantian Review, 18(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415412000313

Tsyba, V. (2015). Sellars’ Epistemological Lexicon. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 33(2), 41-50.

Vossenkuhl, W. (1989). Understanding Individuals. In E. Shaper, & W. Vossenkuhl (Ed.), Reading Kant. New Perspectives on Transcendental Arguments and Critical Philosophy. Oxford, & New York: Blackwell.

Willaschek, M. (2015). The Sensibility of Human Intuition. Kant’s Causal Condition on Accounts of Representation. In R. Enskat (Hrsg.), Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050090238-005

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen: Philosophical Investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell; New York: Kelley.
Published
2016-06-16
How to Cite
Tsyba, V. (2016). Conceptuality of the Intuition: Sellars сompletes Kant’s Epistemology. Sententiae, 34(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent34.01.042
Section
ARTICLES