Що має передавати національна філософська традиція?

Elvira Chukhrai

doi:10.31649/sent45.02.133

Authors

Elvira Chukhrai Vinnytsia National Technical University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4223-6866

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent45.02.133

Keywords:

Ukrainian philosophy, Brazilian philosophy, reception, philosophical institutions, microdiscourses

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the contemporary Ukrainian debate regarding the national philosophical tradition has exhausted its potential in the aspect of “unity versus multiplicity”. Fundamental disagreements between the sides are absent, both in terms of tradition as a “single discourse” and regarding the multiplicity of philosophical phenomena. Since both sides define “tradition” differently, they do not genuinely contradict one another. However, this debate offers a highly fruitful prospect concerning the search for generalising terms to designate multi-level subjects of “Ukrainian-language philosophising”, or philosophising in any other languages. Furthermore, the paper establishes that the successful development of the “local contexts of global philosophies” project is driven by the productive potential of the divergences that generated the aforementioned debate.

Author Biography

Elvira Chukhrai, Vinnytsia National Technical University

Senior lecturer of Philosophy & Humanities Department

References

Chyzhevsky, D. (1992). Essays on the History of Philosophy in Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Oriy.

Davidenko, I., & Panych, O. (2026, February 21). Translation of traditions and the micro-multiverse: what is Ukrainian philosophizing? [Video]. [In Ukrainian]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQfSEalOGDw&t=2166s

Khoma, O. (2024). Tradition and Polyglossia. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 43(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.087

Marques, L. Á. (2024). Perspectives on Brazilian Philosophy in the Last Century. Sententiae, 43(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.055

Marques, L. Á. (2025). The Reception of Global Philosophies in Brazilian Philosophy. Sententiae, 44(2), 6-7. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent44.02.006

Marques, L. Á., & Tchivole, T. A. (2025). A Filosofia Brasileira entre a recepção, tradução e produção situada. Sképsis: Revista de Filosofia, 16(32), 1-4.

Panych, O. (2024). National philosophy and national philosophizing. [In Ukrainian]. In B. Cassin & K. Sigov (Eds.), European dictionary of philosophies: Ukrainian context. Lexicon of untranslatables (Vol. 5, pp. 101-103). Kyiv: Duh i Litera.

Skopnenko, O. I., & Tsymbalyuk, T. V. (2006). Modern Dictionary of Foreign Words. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dovira.

Spilnota Sententiae. (2025, June 19). What is a “national philosophical tradition?” (Part 2/2) [Video]. [In Ukrainian]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUQgMr2840w&t=5987s

Yosypenko, S. (2014). National philosophic traditions as an object of reflection in the field of the history of philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 30(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent30.01.052

Yosypenko, S. (2024). Ukrainian language. [In Ukrainian]. In B. Cassin & K. Sigov (Eds.), European dictionary of philosophies: Ukrainian context. Lexicon of untranslatables (Vol. 5, pp. 79-110). Kyiv: Duh i Litera.