Nietzsche on the “Sovereign Individual” and Agency

André Luís  Mota Itaparica

doi:10.31649/sent45.01.052

Authors

André Luís Mota Itaparica Federal University of Reconcavo da Bahia (Brazil) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-1991

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent45.01.052

Keywords:

free will, determinism, responsibility, irony, fatalism

Abstract

Nietzsche characterizes the sovereign individual using the metaphysical and moral language of free will and responsibility. It is, therefore, unsurprising that this description has sparked significant controversy among Nietzsche’s commentators—particularly in Anglo-American scholarship—as it appears to contradict the vast majority of his positions on these subjects. First, the article presents the two principal currents of interpretation: on one side, commentators who affirm the figure of the sovereign individual as compatible with Nietzsche’s philosophy; on the other, scholars who argue that the passage should be understood as ironic, since it not only contradicts Nietzsche’s steadfast fatalism but also clashes with the central tenets of his philosophy. Second, the article advances a position within this ongoing controversy. In my reading, Nietzsche understands agency as the incorporation of certain attitudes. An agent’s free choice consists only in the decision to transform certain attitudes into instinct, that is, to internalize ideals of conduct in such a way that they can become habits of action.

References

Acampora, C. (2004). On Sovereignty and Overhumanity: Why it Matters How We Read Nie-tzsche’s Genealogy II, 2. In C. Acampora (Ed.), Nietzsche’s on the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays (pp. 147-161). Lanham: Rowman.

Anderson, R. L. (2022). Nietzschean Autonomy and the Meaning of the “Sovereign Individual”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 105(2), 362-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12824

Brusotti, M. (2019). Die Autonomie des “souveränen Individuums” in Nietzsches Genealogie der Moral. Nietzsche-Studien, 48(1), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.1515/nietzstu-2019-0003

Constâncio, J. (2012). “A Sort of Schema of Ourselves”: On Nietzsche’s “Ideal” and “Concept” of Freedom. Nietzsche-Studien, 41(1), 127-162. https://doi.org/10.1515/niet.2012.41.1.127

Elgat, G. (2020). The individualization of conscience: What Daybreak (9, 10, 544) and The Gay Science (117) tell us about the sovereign individual. Inquiry 63(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1669975

Emden, C. J. (2025). Nietzsche Postanalytic? Moral Psychology, Philosophical Naturalism, and the Return of Metaphysics. Nietzsche-Studien, 54(1), 254-316. https://doi.org/10.1515/nietzstu-2025-0021

Gemes, K. (2009). Nietzsche on Free Will, Autonomy, and the Sovereign Individual. In K. Gemes & S. May (Eds.), Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy (pp. 33-49). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231560.001.0001

Hatab, L. J. (2008). Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cam-bridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812002

Hatab, L. J. (2020). Genealogia da Moral de Nietzsche. Uma Introdução. São Paulo: Madras.

Leiter, B. (2011). Who Is Nietzsche’s “Sovereign Individual”? In S. May, Nietzsche’s on The Gene-alogy of Morality: A Critical Guide (pp. 101-119). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139014977.007

Leiter, B. (2019). Quem é o “indivíduo soberano”? Nietzsche sobre a liberdade. (C. Brandão,

R. B. Dalla Vecchia, Trad.). Estudos Nietzsche, 10(1), 69-90. https://periodicos.ufes.br/estudosnietzsche/article/view/21313

Migotti, M. (2013). “A Promise Made is a Debt Unpaid”: Nietzsche on the Morality of Commitment and the Commitments of Morality. In J. Richardson & K. Gemes (Eds), The Oxford Hand-book of Nietzsche (pp. 509-525). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199534647.013.0023

Nietzsche, F. (1988). Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe (Vols. 1-15). (G. Colli, M. Mon-tinari, Hrsg.). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (2001). Beyond Good and Evil. (J. Norman, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812033

Nietzsche, F. (2005). Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Ideals and Others Writings. (Judith Norman, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Nietzsche, F. (2006). On the Genealogy of Morality. (C. Diethe, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Nietzsche, F. (2011). Dawn. (B. Smith, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford UP.

Paschoal, E. (2018). Da crítica de Nietzsche ao sujeito ao sujeito de sua crítica. Cadernos Nietzsche, 39(1), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1590/2316-82422018v3901aep

Pietropaoli, M. (2023). O noblesse oblige do indivíduo soberano. Sobre a Genealogia da moral de Nietzsche. Cadernos Nietzsche, 44(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1590/2316-82422023v4401mp

Pippin, R. B. (2009). How to Overcome Oneself: Nietzsche on Freedom. In K. Gemes & S. May (Eds.), Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy (pp. 69-87). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231560.003.0004

Porcher, F. (2023). Repensar o “indivíduo soberano” de Nietzsche. Cadernos Nietzsche, 44(2), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1590/2316-82422023v4402fp

Richardson, J. (2009). Nietzsche’s Freedoms. In K. Gemes & S. May (Eds.), Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy (pp. 127-49). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231560.003.0007

Sardo, M. (2022). On Freedom and Responsibility in an Extra-Moral Sense: Nietzsche and Non-Sovereign Responsibility. Nietzsche-Studien, 51(1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1515/nietzstu-2020-1018

Snelson, A. (2024). Conscience and Bad Conscience. European Journal of Philosophy, 33(2), 577-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12991