Essence and Characters of Enlightenment




Enlightenment, mediation, medium, educationism, quasi-religiosity, Utopia


In this article the author proves his own concept of the spirit of the Enlightenment and describes the basic features of this phenomenon.
At the beginning of the work the author examines the concept of scientists who believe that the Enlightenment was an event in the history of mediation (C. Siskin, W. Warner, O. Perepelitsa). The author agrees with the basic idea of these researchers, however, he believes that it is necessary to find out about what kind of mediation in question.
The author argues that the Enlightenment is always an attempt to bridge the gap between what is and properly. But education and training is becoming the medium that connects the edges of this gap. The main goal of the Enlightenment is always to make the nature of man, society and the universe the way it should be.
Then, the author identifies three main characteristic of the Enlightenment: educationism, quasi-religiosity, utopian. These characteristics mean that the Enlightenment: 1) creates a world whose axis is problems of education; 2) trying to take on the cultural function of religion; 3) produces a variety of utopia.

Author Biography

Vsevolod Kuznetsov, Vinnytsia National Technical University

Senior lecturer of Philosophy Department


Edelstein, D. (2010). The Enlightenment: A Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ferrone, V., & Roche, D. (Ed.). (2003). World of the Enlightenment. Historical dictionary. Moscow: Pamjatniki istoricheskoj mysli.

Guillory, J. (2010). Enlightening Mediation. In C. Siskin, & W. Warner (Eds.), This is Enlightenment (pp. 37-63). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Israel, J. I. (2013). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750-1790. Oxford: OUP.

Israel, J. I. (2006). Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670-1752. Oxford: OUP.

Israel, J. I. (2002). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750. Oxford: OUP.

Kuznetsov, V. G. (2016). Enlightenment and mediation (reflections on the book “Mediums of the Enlightenment: obscene deviation” by O. Perepelitsa). [In Russian]. Sententiae, 34(1), 161-169.

Kuznetsov, V. G. (2006). Francis Bacon and the formation of the classical Enlightenment paradigm of modern times. [In Russian]. Sententiae, 14-15(1-2), 89-113.

Kuznetsov, V. G. (2000). Russian Way. [In Russian]. In V. G. Kuznetsov, L. G. Nerusheva, Universe of Russia: truth and imaginary (pp. 7-197). Vinnytsia: PE Usatyuk.

Liji. (1973). [in Russian]. In Yang Hinshun, (Ed.), A Philosophy of Ancient Chine. Anthology in 2 vol. (Vol. 2, pp. 99-140). Moscow: Mysl.

MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After virtue: a study in moral theory. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

Malyavin, V. (1997). Lightning in heart. Spiritual awakening in the Chinese tradition. [In Russian]. Moscow: Natalis.

Perepelitsa, O. (2014). Mediums of the Enlightenment: obscene deviation. [In Russian]. Kharkov: University of Kharkov.

Petrov, M. T. (1989). Renaissance problem in Soviet science. Controversial issues of regional renaissance. [In Russian]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Siskin, C., & Warner, W. (2011). If this is Enlightenment then what is Romanticism? European Romantic Review, 22(3), 281-291.

Siskin, C., & Warner, W. (2010). This is Enlightenment: an Invitation in the Form of an Argument. In C. Siskin, & W. Warner, (Ed.), This Is Enlightenment (pp. 1-33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Schmidt, J. (2011). Mediation, Genealogy, and (the) Enlightenment/s. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 45(1), 127-139.


Abstract views: 691



How to Cite

Kuznetsov, V. (2016). Essence and Characters of Enlightenment. Sententiae, 35(2), 94–112.






Download data is not yet available.