The conceptual Apparatus in the Discourse of Ukrainian church Intellectuals of the 17th century: towards the Problem Statement
The article claims the necessity of reflection on those meanings which were given in the 17-18th centuries to the words/concepts/terms used nowadays. The author confirms that the identity of the old semantic content comparing to some interpretations seems illusory. Therefore, researchers working with the old texts often fill them with non-core meanings. Thus the culture of 17-18th centuries can be unjustifiably upgraded and even distorted.
According to the author’s hypothesis, the analysis devoted to the correlation of some abstract concepts with already established lexemes among the Ukrainian intellectuals who only started acquiring its terminological nature, will facilitate future investigation of philosophical elements of thinking in Early Modern Ukrainian culture. Indeed, their ability to feel the nuances of philosophical and theological notions signifies (1) certain skills of “philosophizing”; (2) conscious reception of “another” multi-confessional and foreign sources; (3) understanding the subtle semantic text modulations. Finally, we can reasonably assume that clear distinction of meanings concerning same words depending on the level of word consumption (ordinary or “high” theological-philosophical) is the marker that indicates the beginning of conscious philosophizing.As an example, the concepts of “good” (dobro) and “boon” (blago), in the early 17th century are usually synonymous and refer solely to different language usage (respectively, ancient Ukrainian and Church Slavonic). However, by the end of the century the “good” is gradually established as the reference to moral virtues and material attractiveness, and the “boon” as the reference to heavenly (metaphysical) gifts and expectations of the bliss of “future age”.
Bagro, S. (2013). The idea of Cossack homeland in modern historiography. NaUKMA Scientific Proceedings: Historical Sciences, 143, 48-55.
Bagro, S. (2015). Imagining Cossack homeland: territorial dimension of concept (second half of 17th - beginning of 18th century). [In Ukrainian]. In NaUKMA Scientific Proceedings: Historical Sciences, 169, 4-9.
Berynda, P. (1627). Lexicon slovenoroskyy i imen tolkovanie. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Kiev Pechersk Lavra.
Berynda, P. (2003, February 25). Lexicon slovenoroskyy. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from Izbornyk website: http://litopys.org.ua/berlex/be.htm
Bondarevskaya, І. (2005). Aesthetic paradox of Ukrainian culture in the 17th century. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Parapan.
Busel, V. (Ed.). (2009). Great Dictionary of Modern Ukrainian. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv, & Іrpin: Perun.
Cassin, B., & Sigov, K. (Eds.). (2009-2013). Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon (Vol. 1-3). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter.
Chuba, H. (2011). Ukrainian handwritten «Uchytel’ni Evanhelia». Research. Catalogue. The descriptions. [In Ukrainian]. Кyiv, & Lviv: Svichado.
Chyzhevsky, D. (2005). On the characterology of Slavs. Ukrainians. [In Ukrainian]. In D. Chyzhevsky, Philosophical works in 4 vol. (Vol. 2, pp. 36-42). Kyiv: Smoloskyp.
Coret, E. (1998). Grundriss der Metaphysik. [In Russian]. Kyiv: Tandem.
Bilodid, I. (Ed.). (1970-1980). Dictionary of Ukrainian language in 11 volumes. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved 14 September, 2015, from SUM website: http://sum.in.ua/
Dovga, L. (2012). The value system in the Ukrainian culture of the second half of the XVII century (on the basis of theoretical heritage of Inokentii Gizel). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv, & Lviv: Svicha-do.
Dydyk-Meush, A., Slobodzyanyk, E. (2015). Ukrainian landscapes XVI-XVIII centuries. Word Text Dictionary. [In Ukrainian] Lviv: I. Krypyakevych Institute of Ukrainian Studies, NASU.
Gorsky, V. (1996a). The philosophy in the context of the history of Ukrainian culture. In V. Shynkaruk (Ed.), The phenomenon of Ukrainian culture: methodological principles of interpretation (pp. 192-217). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Philosophy, NASU.
Gorsky, V. (1996b). How is history of Ukrainian philosophy possible in the context of world culture. [In Ukrainian]. Dialogue of cultures. Ukraine in the global context: collection of papers, 2, 44-51.
Gorsky, V. (1999). Kyiv-Mohyla Academy in the history of Ukrainian philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Scientific Proceedings, 9(1), 67-76.
Gritsanov, А. (Ed.). (2001). The World Encyclopedia. Philosophy. [In Russian]. Moscow: АSТ.
Hrynchyshyn, D., & Polyuha, L. (Eds.). (1994). Ukrainian Dictionary 17th - first half 18th (Vol. 2). [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: I. Krypyakevych Institute of Ukrainian Studies, NASU.
Hrynchyshyn, D., Jedlinska, U., Polyuha, L., & Chikalo, М. (Eds.). (2000). Ukrainian Dictionary 16th - first half 17th (Vol. 8). [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: I. Krypyakevych Institute of Ukrainian Studies, NASU.
Ivin, A., & Nikiforov, A. (2010-2011). Dictionary of Logics. [In Russian]. Retrieved 8 September, 2015, from Slovaronline website: http://logic.slovaronline.com/
Khoma, О., & Chukhray, E. (2013). Servais Pinckaers’ Moral Theology and the question about the meaning of life of a modern person. [In Ukrainian]. In S.-Th. Pinckaers, The Sources of Christian Ethics (pp. 441-448). Kyiv: Spirit and Letter.
Kohut, Z. (2004). Roots of Identity: Studies on Early Modern and Modern Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Krytyka.
Korzo, М. (1999). Image of the Person in 17th Century Sermons. [In Russian]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy Press.
Krymsky, S. (1996). Archetypes of Ukrainian culture. In V. Shynkaruk (Ed.), The phenomenon of Ukrainian culture: methodological principles of interpretation (pp. 91-112). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Philosophy, NASU.
The remedy on sleepy human thinking (Likarstvo na ospalyy umysl cholovichyy)… [In Ukrainian]. (1607). Ostrog.
Lisovy, V. (1997). Culture, ideology, politics. Collection of essays. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: O. Teliha Publishing house.
Nitchyk, V. (1997). Petro Mohyla in the spiritual history of Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: UCDK.
Nitchyk, V. (2001). Kyiv-Mohyla Academy and the German culture. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: UCDK.
Peretz, V. (1926). The Question of “Uchytelni Evagelia” of 16th – 18th cent. [In Russian]. Collection of the department of Russian language and literature of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 101(2), 9-14.
Pinckaers, S.-Th. (2013). The Sources of Christian Ethics. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter.
Plokhy, S. (2005). The Cossaks and Religion in Early Modern Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Кrytyka.
Plokhy, S. (2006). The Origins of the Slavic Nations: Premodern Identities in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511496837
Pylypiuk, N., Ilnytzkyj, O., & Kozakov, S. (2008). Online Concordance to the Complete Works of Hryhorii Skovoroda. Retreived 16 September, 2015, from Skovoroda online concordance website: http://www.artsrn.ualberta.ca/skovoroda/
Sakal, Y. (2011). Uchytel’ni Evanhelia of “the type of Zabludiv”: composition and structure. [In Ukrainian]. (Master's thesis). Kyiv: NaUKMA.
Shokhin, V. (2007-2010). Good. In V. Stepin (Ed.), New Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In 4 volumes. [In Russian]. Retrieved 15 September, 2015, from IPhRAS website: http://iph.ras.ru/elib/0419.html
Shokhin, V. (2014) Agatology. Modernity and the classics. [In Russian]. Мoskov: Kanon+
Stratii, I. (2000). The philosophy at Kyiv Mohyla Academy. In V. Gorskiy (Ed.), Kyiv in the history of philosophy of Ukraine. (pp. 73-129). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: KM Academia, & Pulsary.
Stratii, I. (2003). Philosophy of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. [In Ukrainian]. In V. Smoliy & other. (Eds.), The history of Ukrainian culture in 5 volumes (Vol. 3, pp 575-610). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
Stratii, I. (2010). Philosophy in Kyiv-Mohyla Academy: What was it and How to achieve a correct view of it? [In Ukrainian]. Kiev Academy, 8, 139-150.
Symchych, M. (2012). “Ukrainian philosophy”: historical and philosophical canon or research project? [In Ukrainian]. Humanitarni studii, 12, 87-91.
Sysyn, F. (2006). Fatherland in Early Eighteenth-Century Ukrainian Political Culture. [In Ukrainian]. Ukraina Moderna, 10, 7-18.
Tairova-Yakovleva, T. (2013). Ivan Mazepa and the Russian Empire. The history of “treason”. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Klio.
Vorgrimler, H. (2005). Nowy Leksykon Teologiczny. Warszawa: VERBINUM.
Yakovenko, N. (2009). Choice of Name versus Choice of Path: The Names of Ukrainian Territories from the Late Sixteenth to the Late Seventeenth Century. [In Ukrainian]. In О. Betliy, & К. Dysa (Eds.), Intercultural Dialogue: Т. 1: Identity (pp. 57-95). Kyiv: Spirit and Letter.
Yakovenko, N. (2012). “The owners of the fatherland”: the idea of Cossack and Church elite of Hetman of nature and responsibilities of government representation (before the 18th). [In Ukrainian]. In N. Yakovenko, Mirrors of Identity. Studies in the History of Concepts and Ideas in Ukraine (16th through the Early 18th Century) (pp. 397-426). Kyiv: Laurus.
Yaremenko, M. (2012). For “the Honor of the House”, for “Benefit of the Fatherland” and “at the State Service” (the Cossak`s Nobility for schooling in the Eighteenth Century). [In Ukrainian]. In M. Drozdowski, W. Walczak, & K. Wiszowata-Walczak (Eds.), Od Kijowa do Rzymu. Z dziejów stosunków Rzeczypospolitej ze Stolicą Apostolską i Ukrainą. W 35 lecie pracy naukowej Teresie Chynczewskiej-Hennel, Uczniowie, Przyjaciele i Koledzy (pp. 369-388). Białystok: IBNDKE.
Yartseva, V. (Ed.). (1990). Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. [In Russian]. Моscow: Sovetskaya Encyclopedia.
Yosypenko, S. (2008). Towards the origin of Ukrainian modernity. The Ukrainian early modern spiritual culture in the European context. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: UCDK.
Zapasko, Y., Isayevych, Y. (1981). Monuments of book art: catalog of early printed books published in Ukraine: Book. 1, (1574-1700). [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Vyshča shkola.
Zema, W. (1997). Semiotics “simplicity” in the works of John Vyshensky. [In Ukrainian]. Genesis, 1(5), 183-187.
Abstract views: 552 PDF Downloads: 248
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).