Cottingam’s Conception of Descrates’s Trialism and Modern Discussions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent30.01.196Keywords:
Descartes, dualism, trialism, mind–body problemAbstract
The approaches of the main interpreters of Cartesianism as trialism (J. Cottingam, D. Hoffman, T. Schmaltz, etc.) and the critisism of their ideas made by supporters of dualistic interpretation of Cartesianism (M. Rozemond, etc.) are described in the article. Significant changes in the current interpretation of dualism caused by controversy with trialism are marked.
References
Beyssade, J.-M. (2014). The Analysis of the Piece of Wax. [In Ukrainian]. In O. Khoma (Ed.), Descartes' «Meditations» in the mirror of modern interpretations: Jean-Marie Beyssade, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim Sang Ong-Van-Cung (pp. 7-22). Kyiv: Duh i Litera.
Chappell, V. С. (2008). Descartes on Substance. In J. Broughton, & J. Carriero (Eds.), A companion to Descartes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cottingam, J. (2008a). Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartes's philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Cottingam, J. (2008b). Cartesian trialism. In J. Cottingam, Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartes's philosophy (pp. 174-187). Oxford: Oxford UP.
Descartes, R. (1996). Œuvres complètes in 11 vol. (Ch. Adam, & P. Tannery, Eds.). Paris: Vrin.
Descartes, R. (1963-1973). Œuvres philosophiques (T. I-ІІI). (F. Alquié, Éd.). Paris: Garnier frères.
Khoma, O. (Ed.). (2014). Descartes' «Meditations» in the mirror of modern interpretations: Jean-Marie Beyssade, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim Sang Ong-Van-Cung. Kyiv: Duh i Litera.
Hoffman, P. (1999). Cartesian composites. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 37(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.0912
Hoffman, P. (1990). Cartesian Passions and Cartesian Dualism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 71, 310-333.
Hoffman, P. (2009). Essays on Descartes. New York: Oxford UP.
Hoffman, P. (1986). The Unity of Descartes's Man. Philosophical Review, 95(3), 339-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185464
Kambouchner, D. (1995). L'homme des passions: commentaires sur Descartes (Т. 1). Paris: Albin Michel.
Kaufman, D. (2008). Descartes on Composites, Incomplete Substances, and Kinds of Unity (pp. 39-73). Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie,90(1), 39-73. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2008.002
Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard UP.
Marion, J.-L. (2013). Sur la pensée passive de Descartes. Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.mario.2013.01
Markie, P. (1994). Descartes's concepts of substance. In J. Cottingham (Ed), Reason, will, and sensation: studies in Descartes's metaphysics (pp. 63-87). Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford; NY: Oxford UP.
Olivo, G. (1993). L'homme en personne. In Th. Verbeek (Ed.), Descartes et Regius: autour de l'Explication de l'esprit humain Amsterdam (pp. 69-91). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Richardson, R. C. (1982). The 'Scandal' of Cartesian Interactionism. Mind, 91(361), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCI.361.20
Rozemond, M. (1998). Descartes's Dualism. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard UP.
Schmaltz, T. M. (1992). Descartes and Malebranche on Mind and Mind-Body Union. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 281-325. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185536
Skirry, J. (2001). A Hylomorphic Interpretation of Descartes's Theory of Mind-Body Union. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 75, 267-283. https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2001752
Skirry, J. (2005). Descartes and the Metaphysics of Human Nature. London & NY: Continuum.
Skirry, J. (2004). Does Descartes's Real Distinction Argument Prove Too Much? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 78(3), 399-423.
Wilson, M. D. (1976). Descartes: The Epistemological Argument for Mind-Body Distinctness. Nous, 10, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214469
Zaldivar, E. (2011). Descartes's Theory of Substance: Why He Was Not a Trialist. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(3), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2011.563519
Zaldivar, E. (2005). Was Descartes a Trialist? (A thesis presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida). Gainesville, Fl.: University of Florida.
Chappell, V. С. (2008). Descartes on Substance. In J. Broughton, & J. Carriero (Eds.), A companion to Descartes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cottingam, J. (2008a). Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartes's philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Cottingam, J. (2008b). Cartesian trialism. In J. Cottingam, Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartes's philosophy (pp. 174-187). Oxford: Oxford UP.
Descartes, R. (1996). Œuvres complètes in 11 vol. (Ch. Adam, & P. Tannery, Eds.). Paris: Vrin.
Descartes, R. (1963-1973). Œuvres philosophiques (T. I-ІІI). (F. Alquié, Éd.). Paris: Garnier frères.
Khoma, O. (Ed.). (2014). Descartes' «Meditations» in the mirror of modern interpretations: Jean-Marie Beyssade, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim Sang Ong-Van-Cung. Kyiv: Duh i Litera.
Hoffman, P. (1999). Cartesian composites. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 37(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.0912
Hoffman, P. (1990). Cartesian Passions and Cartesian Dualism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 71, 310-333.
Hoffman, P. (2009). Essays on Descartes. New York: Oxford UP.
Hoffman, P. (1986). The Unity of Descartes's Man. Philosophical Review, 95(3), 339-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185464
Kambouchner, D. (1995). L'homme des passions: commentaires sur Descartes (Т. 1). Paris: Albin Michel.
Kaufman, D. (2008). Descartes on Composites, Incomplete Substances, and Kinds of Unity (pp. 39-73). Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie,90(1), 39-73. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2008.002
Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard UP.
Marion, J.-L. (2013). Sur la pensée passive de Descartes. Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.mario.2013.01
Markie, P. (1994). Descartes's concepts of substance. In J. Cottingham (Ed), Reason, will, and sensation: studies in Descartes's metaphysics (pp. 63-87). Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford; NY: Oxford UP.
Olivo, G. (1993). L'homme en personne. In Th. Verbeek (Ed.), Descartes et Regius: autour de l'Explication de l'esprit humain Amsterdam (pp. 69-91). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Richardson, R. C. (1982). The 'Scandal' of Cartesian Interactionism. Mind, 91(361), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCI.361.20
Rozemond, M. (1998). Descartes's Dualism. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard UP.
Schmaltz, T. M. (1992). Descartes and Malebranche on Mind and Mind-Body Union. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 281-325. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185536
Skirry, J. (2001). A Hylomorphic Interpretation of Descartes's Theory of Mind-Body Union. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 75, 267-283. https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2001752
Skirry, J. (2005). Descartes and the Metaphysics of Human Nature. London & NY: Continuum.
Skirry, J. (2004). Does Descartes's Real Distinction Argument Prove Too Much? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 78(3), 399-423.
Wilson, M. D. (1976). Descartes: The Epistemological Argument for Mind-Body Distinctness. Nous, 10, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214469
Zaldivar, E. (2011). Descartes's Theory of Substance: Why He Was Not a Trialist. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(3), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2011.563519
Zaldivar, E. (2005). Was Descartes a Trialist? (A thesis presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida). Gainesville, Fl.: University of Florida.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 398
Abstract views: 692
Published
2014-06-16
How to Cite
Bodnarchuk, L., & Sen’, A. (2014). Cottingam’s Conception of Descrates’s Trialism and Modern Discussions. Sententiae, 30(1), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent30.01.196
Issue
Section
REVIEWS
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
