The Attempt of Surmounting the Subject-Object Approach in Mikhail Bakhtin's Philosophy and Aesthetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent29.02.114Keywords:
transcendental philosophy, subject-object approach, act, consciousness, being, life, culture, theoretism, phenomenological method, intersubjectivity, I and Other, aestheticsAbstract
The article proposes the analysis of Mikhail Bakhtin’s philosophy of act as the surmounting of the subject-object approach specific for the transcendental tradition of philosophy. The notion of act is analyzed as the way out of the frame of the opposition of consciousness and being in transcendental philosophy up to Husserl. The parallel with the Heidegger’s philosophy is indicated. Nevertheless Bakhtin retains dependence from transcendental philosophy. His notion of act has some common features with Descartes’ cogito. The residing dependence from transcendental approach is determined by the uncritical reliance on phenomenological method. This results in Bakhtin’s philosophy and aesthetics partial contradiction to its own claims on its pretheoretical character since the main provisions of the philosophy of act are already loaded with historical cultural predispositions. At the same time it is possible to speak of the transitional character of Bakhtin’s early philosophy and aesthetics.References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2003). Works in 7 vol.: Vol. 1, Philosophical Aesthetics of 1920s. [In Russian]. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries, & LRC.
Coates, R. (1999). Christianity in Bakhtin: God and the Exiled Author. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483127
Descartes, R. (1992). La morale (N. Grimaldi, Ed.). Paris: Vrin.
Descartes, R. (1996). Discours de la méthode. In R. Descartes, Œuvres complètes in 11 vol. (t. 6, pp. 22-31). (Ch. Adam, & P. Tannery, Eds.). Paris: Vrin, 1996.
Fridman, I. N. (1992). The Unfinished Fate of «Aesthetics of Completement». [In Russian]. In L. A. Gogotishvili, & P. S. Gurevich (Eds.), M. M. Bakhtin as a Philosopher (pp. 51-67). Moscow: Nauka.
Habermas, J. (1985). Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Husserl, E. (1973). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge (Nachdruck der 2. verb. Auflage). Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einfuhrung in die reine Phenomenologie. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Isupov, K. G. (2010). The Fates of Classical Legacy and Philosophic and Aesthetic Culture of the Siler Age. [In Russian]. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy.
Lévinas, E. (1972). Humanisme de l'autre homme. Montpellier: Fata morgana.
Lévinas, E. (1995). The Theory of Intuition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern UP.
Molchanov, V. I. (1988). Time and Consciousness. Criticism of Phenomenological Philosophy. [In Russian]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
Motroshilova, N. V. (1974). Husserl and Kant: the Problem of «transcendental» philosophy. [In Russian]. In T. I. Oizerman (Ed.), Kant Philosophy and Modern Times (pp. 329-377). Moscow: Mysl.
Nazintsev, V. V. (1991). Thinker Bakhtin and Theorist Heidegger. [In Russian]. In K. G. Isupov (Ed.), M. Bakhtin and Philosophical Culture of the XX century: (Problems of Bakhtinology). Issue 1, Part 1 (pp. 102-112). St. Petersburg: Obrazovanie.
Prechtl, P. (1991). Husserl zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.
Razeev, D. N. (2004). In the Nets of Phenomenology. [In Russian]. In D. N. Razeev, In the Nets of Phenomenology; E. Husserl, The basic problems of phenomenology (pp. 11-222). St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Saint Petersburg State University.
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Du texte à l'action: Essais d'herménetique. Paris: Seuil. https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782020093774
Savchenkova, N. (1991). The Bounds of Hero in Dialogical Tradition (Bakhtin, Buber, Kierkegaard). [In Russian]. In K. G. Isupov (Ed.), M. Bakhtin and Philosophical Culture of the XX century: (Problems of Bakhtinology). Issue 1, Part 1 (pp. 112-118). St. Petersburg: Obrazovanie.
Schutz, A. (1967). Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern UP.
Simmel, G. (1919). Philosophische Kultur. Leipzig: Kröner.
Spiegelberg, H. (1960). The phenomenological movement: a historical introduction. The Hague: Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5920-5
Vdovina, I. S. (2009). The Phenomenology in France. [In Russian]. Moscow: Canon+, & Reabilitation.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2003). Works in 7 vol.: Vol. 1, Philosophical Aesthetics of 1920s. [In Russian]. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries, & LRC.
Coates, R. (1999). Christianity in Bakhtin: God and the Exiled Author. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483127
Descartes, R. (1992). La morale (N. Grimaldi, Ed.). Paris: Vrin.
Descartes, R. (1996). Discours de la méthode. In R. Descartes, Œuvres complètes in 11 vol. (t. 6, pp. 22-31). (Ch. Adam, & P. Tannery, Eds.). Paris: Vrin, 1996.
Fridman, I. N. (1992). The Unfinished Fate of «Aesthetics of Completement». [In Russian]. In L. A. Gogotishvili, & P. S. Gurevich (Eds.), M. M. Bakhtin as a Philosopher (pp. 51-67). Moscow: Nauka.
Habermas, J. (1985). Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Husserl, E. (1973). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge (Nachdruck der 2. verb. Auflage). Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einfuhrung in die reine Phenomenologie. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Isupov, K. G. (2010). The Fates of Classical Legacy and Philosophic and Aesthetic Culture of the Siler Age. [In Russian]. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy.
Lévinas, E. (1972). Humanisme de l'autre homme. Montpellier: Fata morgana.
Lévinas, E. (1995). The Theory of Intuition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern UP.
Molchanov, V. I. (1988). Time and Consciousness. Criticism of Phenomenological Philosophy. [In Russian]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
Motroshilova, N. V. (1974). Husserl and Kant: the Problem of «transcendental» philosophy. [In Russian]. In T. I. Oizerman (Ed.), Kant Philosophy and Modern Times (pp. 329-377). Moscow: Mysl.
Nazintsev, V. V. (1991). Thinker Bakhtin and Theorist Heidegger. [In Russian]. In K. G. Isupov (Ed.), M. Bakhtin and Philosophical Culture of the XX century: (Problems of Bakhtinology). Issue 1, Part 1 (pp. 102-112). St. Petersburg: Obrazovanie.
Prechtl, P. (1991). Husserl zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.
Razeev, D. N. (2004). In the Nets of Phenomenology. [In Russian]. In D. N. Razeev, In the Nets of Phenomenology; E. Husserl, The basic problems of phenomenology (pp. 11-222). St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Saint Petersburg State University.
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Du texte à l'action: Essais d'herménetique. Paris: Seuil. https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782020093774
Savchenkova, N. (1991). The Bounds of Hero in Dialogical Tradition (Bakhtin, Buber, Kierkegaard). [In Russian]. In K. G. Isupov (Ed.), M. Bakhtin and Philosophical Culture of the XX century: (Problems of Bakhtinology). Issue 1, Part 1 (pp. 112-118). St. Petersburg: Obrazovanie.
Schutz, A. (1967). Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern UP.
Simmel, G. (1919). Philosophische Kultur. Leipzig: Kröner.
Spiegelberg, H. (1960). The phenomenological movement: a historical introduction. The Hague: Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5920-5
Vdovina, I. S. (2009). The Phenomenology in France. [In Russian]. Moscow: Canon+, & Reabilitation.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 227
Abstract views: 378
Published
2013-12-16
How to Cite
Yudin, A. (2013). The Attempt of Surmounting the Subject-Object Approach in Mikhail Bakhtin’s Philosophy and Aesthetics. Sententiae, 29(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent29.02.114
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
