Analytic History of Ancient Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent28.01.096Keywords:
history of philosophy, Ancient philosophy, analytic philosophy, philosophical argumentation, formalization, Presocratics, PatristicsAbstract
The paper discusses the peculiarities of the analytic approach to the history of Ancient philosophy in the context of other, more popular approaches and genres. This approach is based on finding out an implicit argumentation and problems in the philosophical texts, and establishing logical connections between them. The paper also considers the perspectives of application of this approach to patristic texts. In addition, it shows the necessity of formalization and symbolization in the analytic history of philosophy.References
Akhutin, A. V. (2011). How Can Another Understand You? A Reply to S. Mouraviev's Article. [In Russian]. Logos, 4(83), 29-40.
Barnes, J. (1982). The Presocratic Philosophers. London, & Boston, Mass.: Routledge.
Berestov, I. V. (2011a). Principle of the Indiscernibility of Identicals in Parmenides' Arguments for Unintelligibility of any Plurality and Differences in the What-Is. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 9(3), 135-144.
Berestov, I. V. (2011b). The Regressus ad Infinitum in Zeno's of Elea Argumentation for the Simplicity of 'What Is'. [In Russian]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 16(4), 131-145.
Berestov, I. V. (2012). Plotinus' Consideration of the Eleatic Arguments against the Plurality of 'What-Is' in His Consideration of the Nous. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 10(4), 122-133.
Butakov, P. A. (2012a). The Category of Relation in Early Christian Trinitarian Theories. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 10(4), 134-141.
Butakov, P. A. (2012b). The Role of Irrationalistic Argumentation in the Works of Gregory of Nazianzus. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy. 10(2), 163-171.
Crisp, O. D., & Rea, M. C. (Eds.). (2009). Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203567.001.0001
Cross, R. (1999). Ockham on Part and Whole. Vivarium, 37(2), 143-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853400323241913
Dovgopolova, O. A. (2012). Notes on the method of a-historical reconstruction. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (6), 94-98.
Graham, D. W. (2006). Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton, & Oxford: Princeton UP.
Lebedev, A. (Ed.). (1989). The Fragments of the Early Greek Philosophers: Part I, From the Epic Theocosmogonies to the Birth of the Atomistics. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.
Lloyd, A. C. (1998). The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford: Oxford UP, & Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238061.001.0001
Lobovikov, V. O. The doctrine of Parmenides and Melissus about nonbeing of movement and the «Guillotine of D. Hume» from the viewpoint of two-valued algebra of metaphysics. [In Russian]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 14(2), 130-138.
Manchester, P. B. (1979). Parmenides and the Need of Eternity. The Monist, 62(1), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19796212
Moreschini, C. (2011). The History of Patristic Philosophy. [In Russian]. Moscow: Yuriy Shichalin's Museum Graeco-Latinum.
Mouraviev, S. N. (2011). Can we hear Heraclitus? Or do we just think we do? [In Russian]. Logos, 4 (83), 3-28.
Plato. (2003). Plato's Parmenides. (S. Scolnicov, Trans. & Ed.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, & London: University of California Press.
Polyak, H. (2010). Modal Logic Applications in Analysis of Scholastic Metaphysics. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka: Special Issue Sententiae, Vol. I: The Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, 138-144.
Sherbakova, E. A. (2012). A joke in Plato. Platonic interpretation of heraclitean «flux». [In Russian]. Aristeas. Philologia classica et historia antiqua, 5, 157-167.
Sweeney, M. (2001). The Lectures in Medieval Philosophy: Vol. I, The Medieval Christian Philosophy in the West. [In Russian]. Moscow: Yuriy Shichalin's Museum Graeco-Latinum.
Volf, M. N. (2012). Philosophical inquiry: Heraclitus and Parmenides. [In Russian]. St-Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy.
Volf, M. N., & Berestov, I. V. (2007). Problem-oriented approach to Ancient philosophy. [In Russian]. SCHOLE. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 1(2), 203-246.
Barnes, J. (1982). The Presocratic Philosophers. London, & Boston, Mass.: Routledge.
Berestov, I. V. (2011a). Principle of the Indiscernibility of Identicals in Parmenides' Arguments for Unintelligibility of any Plurality and Differences in the What-Is. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 9(3), 135-144.
Berestov, I. V. (2011b). The Regressus ad Infinitum in Zeno's of Elea Argumentation for the Simplicity of 'What Is'. [In Russian]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 16(4), 131-145.
Berestov, I. V. (2012). Plotinus' Consideration of the Eleatic Arguments against the Plurality of 'What-Is' in His Consideration of the Nous. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 10(4), 122-133.
Butakov, P. A. (2012a). The Category of Relation in Early Christian Trinitarian Theories. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 10(4), 134-141.
Butakov, P. A. (2012b). The Role of Irrationalistic Argumentation in the Works of Gregory of Nazianzus. [In Russian]. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy. 10(2), 163-171.
Crisp, O. D., & Rea, M. C. (Eds.). (2009). Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203567.001.0001
Cross, R. (1999). Ockham on Part and Whole. Vivarium, 37(2), 143-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853400323241913
Dovgopolova, O. A. (2012). Notes on the method of a-historical reconstruction. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (6), 94-98.
Graham, D. W. (2006). Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton, & Oxford: Princeton UP.
Lebedev, A. (Ed.). (1989). The Fragments of the Early Greek Philosophers: Part I, From the Epic Theocosmogonies to the Birth of the Atomistics. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.
Lloyd, A. C. (1998). The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford: Oxford UP, & Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238061.001.0001
Lobovikov, V. O. The doctrine of Parmenides and Melissus about nonbeing of movement and the «Guillotine of D. Hume» from the viewpoint of two-valued algebra of metaphysics. [In Russian]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 14(2), 130-138.
Manchester, P. B. (1979). Parmenides and the Need of Eternity. The Monist, 62(1), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19796212
Moreschini, C. (2011). The History of Patristic Philosophy. [In Russian]. Moscow: Yuriy Shichalin's Museum Graeco-Latinum.
Mouraviev, S. N. (2011). Can we hear Heraclitus? Or do we just think we do? [In Russian]. Logos, 4 (83), 3-28.
Plato. (2003). Plato's Parmenides. (S. Scolnicov, Trans. & Ed.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, & London: University of California Press.
Polyak, H. (2010). Modal Logic Applications in Analysis of Scholastic Metaphysics. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka: Special Issue Sententiae, Vol. I: The Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, 138-144.
Sherbakova, E. A. (2012). A joke in Plato. Platonic interpretation of heraclitean «flux». [In Russian]. Aristeas. Philologia classica et historia antiqua, 5, 157-167.
Sweeney, M. (2001). The Lectures in Medieval Philosophy: Vol. I, The Medieval Christian Philosophy in the West. [In Russian]. Moscow: Yuriy Shichalin's Museum Graeco-Latinum.
Volf, M. N. (2012). Philosophical inquiry: Heraclitus and Parmenides. [In Russian]. St-Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy.
Volf, M. N., & Berestov, I. V. (2007). Problem-oriented approach to Ancient philosophy. [In Russian]. SCHOLE. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 1(2), 203-246.
Downloads
-
PDF (Російська)
Downloads: 278
Abstract views: 428
Published
2013-06-16
How to Cite
Volf, M., Butakov, P., & Berestov, I. (2013). Analytic History of Ancient Philosophy. Sententiae, 28(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent28.01.096
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
