Rebirth of Socratic Origins of Philosophy in the Digital Era

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.106

Keywords:

The Panpsycast, dialog, debate, podcast-based books, oral history of philosophy

Abstract

It has been proven that philosophical dialogues and debates using digital information dissemination tools now play a leading role in popularizing philosophy beyond the academic community. It has been established that the main differences between oral dialogue and printed interviews are the degree of text editing, the possibility of changing the positions of dialogue participants, the presence of speech intonational and emotional colouring, and stylistic communication limitations. The perceptual advantages of oral dialogue lie in its accessibility to a wide range of people, deeper immersion in the communicative situation, and a better understanding of the personal traits of the communication participants.

Author Biographies

Jack Symes, Durham University

PhD, Researcher in philosoph

Nataliia Reva, University of Vienna

PhD, Visiting research fellow

Nataliia Shcherbyna-Supruniuk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD

Vsevolod Khoma, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD student

Downloads

Abstract views: 219

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Symes, J., Reva, N., Shcherbyna-Supruniuk, N., & Khoma, V. (2024). Rebirth of Socratic Origins of Philosophy in the Digital Era. Sententiae, 43(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.106

Issue

Section

DIALOGUES ABOUT METHODOLOGY

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>