Усність як елемент історико-філософського дослідження

Nataliia Reva

doi:10.31649/sent43.01.029

Authors

Nataliia Reva University of Birmingham (United Kingdom) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-3755

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.01.029

Keywords:

oral history of philosophy, oral philosophy, oral history, orality, philosophical interview

Abstract

In the current research, using methods of oral history of philosophy, oral communication (in particular, interviews) is considered only as a technical phase in preparing the final text. The author claims that the primary audio or video recordings of such an interview, an "oral draft," should be considered independent material. After all, the written text does not reflect the interlocutors' intonations; comparing the source material and the final text may become important for future researchers. After the transcribed and agreed text of the interview took its final shape, it should be analyzed by the interlocutors and supplemented with a commentary. This commentary aims to (1) clarify vague points of the text and (2) record the further opinions of the interviewer and interviewee. Therefore, the purpose of an interview that uses an oral history of philosophy should be an audio/video recording, a final text, and a commentary.

Author Biography

Nataliia Reva, University of Birmingham (United Kingdom)

PhD, Visiting research fellow

References

Аbrams, L. (2016). Oral History Theory. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640761

Belvedere, C., & Gros, A. (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Macrophenomenology and Social Theory. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34712-2

Chayka, T. (2009). The touch. Presentation of the project “Oral Stories of Philosophers”. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (3), 140-145. http://journal.philosophy.ua/article/nid7433

Chayka, T. (2019). Open laboratory of oral history. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006

Davidenko, I. (2022). Current State of Researh on the Oral History of Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 41(2), 235-238. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.235

Golovakha, Y., Zborovska, X., Khelufi, A., & Khoma, V. (2017). Subjective view on Ukrainian philosophy (Conversation with Xenija Zborovska, Amina Khelufi and Vsevolod Khoma). [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 36(1), 173-214. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent36.01.173

Heimann, K., Boelsbjerg, H. B., Allen, C., & al. (2023) The lived experience of remembering a ʼgoodʼ interview: Micro-phenomenology applied to itself. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 22, 217-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09844-4

Hobza, P. (2003). Orality and Philosophy. Philosophica, 5, 127-146

Imbo, S. O. (2001). Oral Traditions as Philosophy: Okot PʼBitekʼs Legacy for African Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Khoma, O. (2019). Oral history of philosophy as a research perspective. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006

Khoma, V. (2019). The Limits of Credibility in the Oral History of Philosophy: The Problem of Memory. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.067

Klein, A. C. (1994). Path to the Middle: Oral Madhyamika Philosophy in Tibet. [In Ukrainian]. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Kozlovskyi, V., Davidenko, I., Kruhlyk, K., & Popil, D. (2020). Hegel and Ukrainian Philosophy of the 70-80th. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 39(2), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.241

Loftus, E. F. (1991). Witness for the Defense: The Accused, the Eyewitness, and the Expert Who Puts Memory on Trial. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.

Lytvynenko, O. (2019). Formal and informal side of the history of philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 38-41. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006

Myronenko, R. (2019). Oral history of philosophy as a return to the sources of philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 41-43. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006

Ong, W. (2012). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (30th anniversary ed. with additional chapters). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203103258

Presbey, G. M. (1996). Ways in which Oral Philosophy is superior to Written Philosophy: a look at Odera Orukaʼs rural sages. Apa Newsletters, 96(1), 6-10.

Proleev, S. (2019). Oral history of philosophy as a theoretical possibility of philosophizing. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006

Sigov, O. (2019). Ethics of testimony: experience of the unspeakable and testimony of the impossible. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006

Simoroz, O. (2019). The need for reflection in the oral history of philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.053

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. London: Sage.

Yosypenko, S. (2019а). “More than the Interview”. Overview of the section “Oral History of Philos-ophy” in the Journal “Filosofska Dumka”.[In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 38(2), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent38.02.086

Yosypenko, S. (2019b). Oral history of philosophy as a source of historical-philosophical research. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006

Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience. Abingdon: Routledge.

Varela, F. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330-349.

Viatkina, N., Kkhelufi, A., Myroshnyk, K., & Reva, N. (2021). “The saved and the lost.” Attempt to recall on-line. Part II. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 40(1), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.01.160

Zborovska, K. et al. (2019). Dialogicity of philosophizing, or Why is the oral history of philosophy now necessary for historical-philosophical practice? [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006