The foundations of the historical-philosophical reconstruction of the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent12.01.054Keywords:
Theory of experience, philosophia prima, episteme, matrix, languageAbstract
The article is devoted to the role of language, conceptual schemes, ontology and epistemic losses in the works of Thomas Hobbes. The author highlights two types of interpretive schemes: (1) emphasis on systematic unity and integrity in Hobbes's work, (2) consideration of Hobbes' works as a set of individual parts. Two ways of justifying the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes are also investigated: based on prudence and definitive (scientific). The author justifies that philosophia prima is Hobbes's theory of experience and that it is human experience that makes science possible.
References
Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. [In Russian]. St. Petersburg: A-cad.
Gryaznov, B. S. (1982). Logic. Rationality. Creativity. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.
Hobbes, T. (1991). Human Nature. In T. Hobbes, Collected Works: In 2 Volumes (Vol. 1, pp. 507-573). [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.
Hobbes, T. (1991). On Citizenship. In T. Hobbes, Collected Works: In 2 Volumes (Vol. 1, pp. 270-506). [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.
Hobbes, T. (1991). On the Body. In T. Hobbes, Collected Works: In 2 Volumes (Vol. 1, pp. 66-218). [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.
Hobbes, T. (2000). Leviathan. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i litera.
Jacquot, J., & Jones, H. W. (1973). Thomas Hobbes: Critique du De Mundo de Thomas White. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.
Johnson, L. (1986). Thomas Hobbes: Architektonik - Interpretation - Anthropologie. Wien: VWGÖ.
Kuhn, T. (2001). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Port-Royal.
Marquard, O. (1972). Anthropologie. In J. Ritter (Hrsg.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (Bd. 1, SS 362-374). Basel: Schwabe.
Mayer, G. (2002). Hobbes. In A. Loy & Ye. Prychepiy (Eds.), Classics of Political Thought (pp. 214-226). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Tandem.
Mayer, M. (1992). Leiblichkeit und Konvention: Struktur und Aporien der Wissenschaftsbegründung bei Hobbes und Poincaré.
Freiburg (Breisgau): Alber.
Oaceshott, M. (1957). Introduction. In M. Oaceshott (ed.), Th. Hobbes «Leviathan». Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Pacchi, A. (1965). Convenzione e ipotesi nella formatione della filosofia naturale di Thomas Hobbes. Firenzi: La Nuova Italia.
Riedel, M. (1981). Paradigmawechsel in der politischen Philosophie? Hobbes und Aristoteles. In O. Höffe (Hrsg.), Hobbes Ôh. Anthropologie und Staatsphilosophie (SS. 93-111). Freiburg (Schweiz.): Universitätsverlag.
Spragers, T. A. (1973). The Politics of Motion. The World of Thomas Hobbes. Lexington (Ken.): The University Press of Kentucky.
Uemov, A. I. (1984). On the Problem of Assessing the Prospects of Scientific Research. In D. Gorsky (Ed.), The Creative Nature of Scientific Knowledge (pp. 189-221). [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 62
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
