The theory of a natural state: Rawls, Nozick, Buchanan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent26.01.082Abstract
The author suggests an analysis of three modern authors' state of nature models (J. Rawls, R. Nozick, J. Buchanen) and tries to define the role of the models in their respective law concepts. The analysis demonstrates that all three approaches share same basic idea, which is the concept of an independent reasonable individual; this very idea is what these different models are based upon. The concept of an individual itself does not have a substantiation.References
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (???). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1063&Itemid=27
Buchanan, J. (1975). The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago, & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Flickshuh, K. (2003). Kant and Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Furubotn, E., & Pejovich S. (1972). Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 10, 1137-1162.
Nagel, T. (2003). Rawls and Liberalism. In S. R. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (pp. 62-85). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
Parijs, P. van. (2003). Difference Principles. In S. R. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (pp. 200-240). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Pejovich, S. (1972). Towards an Economic Theory of the Creation and Specification of Property Rights. Review of Social Economy, 30, 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767200000041
Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as Fairness. The Philosophical Review, 67(2), 164-194.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts, & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard UP.
Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia UP.
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.
Rothbard, M. N. (1977). Robert Nozick and Immaculate Conception of the State. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 1(1), 45-57.
Buchanan, J. (1975). The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago, & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Flickshuh, K. (2003). Kant and Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Furubotn, E., & Pejovich S. (1972). Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 10, 1137-1162.
Nagel, T. (2003). Rawls and Liberalism. In S. R. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (pp. 62-85). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
Parijs, P. van. (2003). Difference Principles. In S. R. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (pp. 200-240). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Pejovich, S. (1972). Towards an Economic Theory of the Creation and Specification of Property Rights. Review of Social Economy, 30, 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767200000041
Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as Fairness. The Philosophical Review, 67(2), 164-194.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts, & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard UP.
Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia UP.
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.
Rothbard, M. N. (1977). Robert Nozick and Immaculate Conception of the State. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 1(1), 45-57.
Downloads
-
PDF (Російська)
Downloads: 366
Abstract views: 429
Published
2012-06-16
How to Cite
Shevtsov, S. (2012). The theory of a natural state: Rawls, Nozick, Buchanan. Sententiae, 26(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent26.01.082
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).