Abstract law and actual reality: social critique from F. Poullain de la Barre to Charles Fourier

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent05.01.130

Keywords:

feminism, Cartesianism, women's rights, social criticism, French Revolution, natural law, Enlightenment

Abstract

The article compares the views of François Poullain de la Barre and Charles Fourier on gender equality. The research is based on the background of historical and philosophical transformations associated with the transition from Cartesian rationalism to enlightenment and post-enlightenment thinking. The latter focuses primarily on social criticism and human transformation through the transformation of social relations. Although the author states that some of the provisions of French philosophers have a common origin (the ideological potential of Cartesianism and the modern doctrine of natural law), they interpret the target aspect differently. While Poullain de la Barre seeks to prove the identity of men's and women's abilities, Fourier's task is to find practical grounds that will allow for real equality of the sexes. In addition, the degree of equality achieved by women is derived from the degree of overcoming social (in particular, economic) injustice in general.

References

Aivazova, S. (1992). Toward the History of Feminism. [In Russian]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennostʼ, (6), 153-168.

Aivazova, S. (1998). A Woman Has the Right to Go to the Scaffold and Therefore Should Also Have the Right to Go to the Tribune. [In Russian]. Zhenshchiny Rossii, (5).

Beauvoir, S. de. (1994). The Second Sex. [In Ukrainian]. Vsesvit, (2), 163-168.

Chukhim, N. (2001). Theories of Sexual Dimorphism in the Philosophy of the Enlightenment. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska dumka, (1), 26-55.

Fourier, C. (1951). The New Industrial World, or Nature-Conforming Social Action. [In Russian]. In C. Fourier, Works in 4 vol. (Vols. 3-4). Moscow, & Leningrad: RISO AN USSR.

Fourier, C. (1951). The Theory of Four Movements. [In Russian]. In C. Fourier, Works in 4 vol. (Vols. 1-2). Moscow, & Leningrad: RISO AN USSR.

Fraisse, G. (1998). Les femmes etleurhistoire. Paris: Gallimard.

Hobbes, T. (1989). Leviathan. [In Russian]. In T. Hobbes, Works in 2 vol. (Vol. 2, pp. 3-546). Moscow: Mysl.

Khoma, O. (1998). Truth and Obviousness: Symptomatic Thinking in Modern Philosophy. [In Russian]. Vinnytsia: Universum.

Khoma, O. (2001). Commentaries on F. Poulain de la Barre's Treatise On the Equality of the Two Sexes. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 4(2), 172-179.

Khoma, O. (2001). François Poulain de la Barre and the Philosophy of the Modern Era. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 4(2), 186-201.

Khoma, O. (2001). Abstract Reviews. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 4(2), 202-239.

Kissel, M. A., Solovyov, E. Y., & Oizerman, T. I. (1989). French Enlightenment and Revolution. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.

Poulain de la Barre, F. (1984). De l’égalité des deux sexes. Paris: Fayard.

Poulain de la Barre, F. (2001). On the Equality of The Two Sexes. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 4(2), 108-171.

Roments, V. O. (1993). History of Psychology in the Enlightenment Era. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Vyshcha Shkola.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1961). Julie, or the New Heloise. [In Russian]. In J.-J. Rousseau, Works in 3 vol. (Vol. 2). Moscow: Mysl.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1961). Letter to M. d'Alembert on the theatre. [In Russian]. In J.-J. Rousseau, Works in 3 vol. (Vol. 1). Moscow: Mysl.

Rousseau, J.-J. (2001). On the Social Contract. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Port-Royal.

Vasilykova, Y. V. (1978). Charles Fourier. [In Russian]. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya.

Voltaire. (1998). Philosophical Dictionary. [In Russian]. In Voltaire, Works in 3 vol. (Vol. 3, pp. 7-164). Moscow: Literatura, & Sigma-Press.

Voltaire. (1998). Selected Letters. [In Russian]. In Voltaire, Works in 3 vol. (Vol. 3, pp. 505-601). Moscow: Literatura, & Sigma-Press.

Zilberfarb, I. (1964). Social Philosophy of Charles Fourier. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.

Downloads

Abstract views: 51

Published

2002-04-22

How to Cite

Slobodianuk, O. (2002). Abstract law and actual reality: social critique from F. Poullain de la Barre to Charles Fourier. Sententiae, 5(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent05.01.130

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.