Паралелізм душі та тіла у Спінози: об’єктивація чи індивідуалізація?

Olga Gomilko

doi:10.31649/sent03.01.023

Mind Body Parallelism in Spinoza: Objectivation or Individualisation?

Authors

Olga Gomilko Hryhoriy Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-9191

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent03.01.023

Abstract

Author starts from hypothesis that Spinoza has developed ideas that are much wider than «modern project» and foresees concepts that were actualized by philosophy of the end of XXth c. Namely: 1) Spinoza opposes to desomatization of human: in modern philosophy ontological horizon of body was hardly considered. Spinoza takes ontological position of mind-body parallelism. Spinoza becomes «post-modernist» due to thinking and extension being attributes of single substance. 2) Mind-body parallelism is equivocal to contemporary problem of differences, in particular for definition in self-identity through differences. The author shows theses showing Spinoza`s importance: 1) fact of the bode is rationally grounded; 2) body is unique and is not reducible; 3) mind cannot make concept of a human without hers body. Therefore, researches of XXth c. draw on Spinoza`s heritage, being with it in appreciable resonance.

References

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A Thousand Plateaus. London: Athlone Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1996). Capitalism and schizophrenia: anti-Edip. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: SINTO.

Descartes, R. (1989). Principia Philosophiae [In Russian]. In R. Descartes, Works in 2 vol. (Vol. 1, pp. 297-422). Moscow: Mysl.

Goffey, A. (1998). Nature=x (notes on spinozist ethics). In J. Wood (Ed.), The Virtual Embodied. Presence/Practice/Technology (pp. 63-75). London : Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203067499

Rorty, R. (1997). Spinoza Lecture 1. Is it desirable to love truth? In R. Rorty, Truth, Politics and Post-Modernism. Assen: Van Gorcum

Ross, S. (1998). The gift of touch: Embodving the good. Albany: State University of New Vork Press.

Downloads

pdf (Українська)
Downloads: 12

Abstract views: 41

Published

2001-06-25

How to Cite

Gomilko, O. (2001). Mind Body Parallelism in Spinoza: Objectivation or Individualisation?. Sententiae, 3(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent03.01.023

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2001): SENTENTIAE

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).