Quine, Goodman, Putnam: the Harvard Philosophical School
Keywords:Willard Van Orman Quine, Nelson Goodman, Hilary Putnam, William James, relativism, realism, antirealism, pragmatism, neopragmatism
The article offers formal and doctrinal reasons that prove the existence of the “Harvard Philosophical School” as a real historico-philosophical phenomenon. The author includes Willard Van Orman Quine, Nelson Goodman, and Hilary Putnam in this school. The aim of this article is to compare the conceptualism, relativism and anti-realism of Quine, Goodman and Pantem, on the basis of (neo)pragmatic tendencies in their philosophical studies.
Formal reasons: all these philosophers were professors at Harvard University; in addition, Quine was a teacher of Goodman and Putnam, Goodman was a teacher of Putnam.
Doctrinal reasons: (1) Quine, Goodman, and Putnam, each in his own specific pragmatic way, stood on the positions of relativism, anti-realism, conceptualism, and tried to separate themselves from “cultural relativism”; (2) common touchstone concepts and tendencies in particular in their philosophical investigations are: conceptual scheme, indeterminacy of translation, internal criteria, ontological relativity and others; (3) the obvious analogy between Quine's standards of similarity, Goodman's standards of correctness, and standards for Putnam's conceptual schemes.
Thus, we have strong reasons to consider Quine, Goodman and Putnam as representatives of a common philosophical school. The role played in their doctrines by the ideas of William James, who also taught at Harvard, at least hypothetically allows us to expand the boundaries of this school.
Baghramian, M. (2004). Relativism. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203645895
Dewey, J. (1941). Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth. In Journal of Philosophy, 38(7): 169-186. https://doi.org/10.2307/2017978
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method. London: New Left Books.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350928558
Goodman, N. (1984). Of Minds and Other Matters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goodman, N. (1996). On Starmaking. In P. J. McCormick (Ed.), Starmaking: Realism, Anti-Realism, and Irrealism (pp. 143-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
James, W. (1975). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Papineau, D. (1987). Reality and Representation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625398
Putnam, H. (1987). The Many Faces of Realism. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Putnam, H. (1990). Realism with a Human Face. (J. Conant, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (1992). Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042384
Putnam, H. (2000). The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body, and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Speaking of Objects. In W. V. O. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (pp. 1-25). New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/quin92204-002
Quine, W. V. O. (1974). Methods of Logic. London: Routledge.
Quine, W. V. O. (1975). On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World. Erkenntnis, 9(3): 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178004
Quine, W. V. O. (1981). Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1984). Relativism and Absolutism. Monist, 67(3), 293-296. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist198467318
Quine, W. V. O. (1992). The Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1993). Three Indeterminacies. In R. Barrett & R. Gibson (Eds.), Perspectives on Quine. (pp. 1-15). Oxford: Blackwell.
Siegel, H. (1987) Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism. Dordrecht: Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7746-5
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).