Moses Mendelssohn and Formation of Jewish Culture in the Time of Enlightenment: Political and Language Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.02.165Keywords:
Moses Mendelssohn, Haskalah (Jewish ”Enlightenment”), Early Modern Jewish philosophy, Haskalah in recent HistoriographyAbstract
The review demonstrates that there are four main historiographical approaches to explanation of the role of Mendelssohn’s philosophy in the emergence of the Haskalah project: (1) traditional approach (created by the Jewish historiography in the second half of the 19th century; it stressed secular and culture-centered character of Haskalah, making it closer to German intellectual tradition); (2) social historiography (it treated Haskalah as a consequence of and reaction to the processes of global social and political modernization); (3) the approach practiced by researchers of early Jewish proponents of Enlightenment’s (determination of the intellectual foundations of Haskalah in the early Maskilim projects); (4) the researches of Mendelssohn's Jewish texts, the concept of “Political Theology”, and the interpretation of Mendelssohn’s ideas in the works of Leo Strauss (new interpretation of the role of Mendelssohn in the creation of Haskalah).
References
Albrecht, M., & Engel, E. J. (Eds.). (2000). Moses Mendelssohn im Spannungsfeld der Aufklärung. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
Altmann, A. (1973). Moses Mendelssohn. A Biographical Study. Alabama: Alabama UP.
Arkush, A. (1994). Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bernardini, P. L., & Lucci, D. (2012). The Jews, Instructions for Use. Four Eighteenth-Century Projects for the Emancipation of European Jews. Boston: Academic Studies Press.
Bernstein, J. A. (2014). The Theological-Political Problem in Leo Strauss’s Writings on Moses Mendelssohn. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 22(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341256
Breuer, E., & Sorkin, D. (Eds.). (2018). Moses Mendelssohn's Hebrew Writings. Yale: Yale UP.
Diamond, J. A. & Hughes A. W. (Eds.). (2012). Encountering the Medieval in Modern Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.
Ducheyne, S. (Ed.). (2017). Reassessing the Radical Enlightenment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613642
Feiner, S. (2004). The Jewish Enlightenment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Feiner, S. (2011). The Origins of Jewish Secularization in Eighteenth-Century Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goldenbaum, U. (1996). Mendelssohns philosophischer Einstieg in die schönen Wissenschaften. Zu einer ästhetischen Rezeption Spinozas. In M. Fontius, & W. Schneiders (Eds.). Die Philosophie und die Belles-Lettres. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Gottlieb, M. (2003). The ambiguity of reason: Mendelssohn's writings on Spinoza. PhD dissertation. Indiana University.
Gottlieb, M. (2009). Counter-Enlightenment in a Jewish Key: Anti-Maimonideanism in Nineteenth-Century Orthodoxy. In J. T. Robinson (Ed.). The Cultures of Maimonideanism New Approaches to the History of Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.
Gottlieb, M. (2011). Faith and Freedom. Moses Mendelssohn's Theological-Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398946.001.0001
Gottlieb, M., & Manekin, Ch. H. (Eds.). (2015). Moses Mendelssohn: Enlightenment, Religion, Politics, Nationalism. Bethesda, Maryland: University Press of Maryland.
Hasselhoff, G. K. (2009). Manuel Joel and the Neo-Maimonidean Discovery of Kant. In J. T. Robinson (Ed.). The Cultures of Maimonideanism New Approaches to the History of Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.
Hippler, Th. (2008). Spinoza et l’histoire. Studia Spinozana, 16, 155-176.
Hippler, Th. (2012). L’éthique de l’historien spinoziste: Histoire et raison chez Spinoza. Astérion. Philosophie, Histoire des idées, pensée politique, 10. https://doi.org/10.4000/asterion.2307
Kohler, G. Y. (2009). Maimonides and Ethical Monotheism: The Influence of the Guide of the Perplexed on German Reform Judaism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century. In J. T. Robinson. (Ed.). The Cultures of Maimonideanism New Approaches to the History of Jewish Thought. Leiden: Brill.
Kohler, G. Y. (2012). Reading Maimonides' Philosophy in 19th Century Germany. The Guide to Religious Reform. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4035-8
Mendelssohn, M. (1972). Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Band 14: Hebräische Schriften I. (H. Borodianski (Bar-Dayan), Hrsg.). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann.
Meyer, M. (1972). The Origins of the Modern Jew: Jewish Identity and European Culture in Germany, 1749-1824. Detroit: Wayne State UP.
Munk, R. (ed.). (2011). Moses Mendelssohn's Metaphysics and Aesthetics. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2451-8
Pollok, A. (2009). Facetten des Menschen. Zur Anthropologie Moses Mendelssohns. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Porter, R. S., & Teich, M. (Eds.). (1981). The Enlightenment in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561283
Rosenthal, M. A. (2008a). Spinoza and the philosophy of history. In Ch. Huenemann (Ed.). Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 111-127). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Rosenthal, M. A. (2008b). Spinoza, history, and jewish modernity. In Ch. H. Manekin, & R. Eisen (Eds.). Philosophers and the Jewish Bible (pp. 113-130). Bethseda: University of Maryland Press.
Sacks, E. (2017). Moses Mendelssohn's Living Script: Philosophy, Practice, History, Judaism. Bloomington, & Indianapolis: Indiana UP.
Schweid, E. (2011). History of Modern Jewish Religious Philosophy. Volume 1: The Period of the Enlightenment. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207332.i-362
Schweid, E. (2015). History of Modern Jewish Religious Philosophy. Volume 2: The Birth of Jewish Historical Studies and the Modern Jewish Religious Movements. Leiden: Brill.
Septimus, B. (1982) Hispano-Jewish Culture in Transition: The Career and Controversies of Ramah. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard UP.
Septimus, B. (1983). Nahmanides and the Andalusian Tradition. In I. Twersky (Ed.). Rabbi Moses Nahmanides (Ramban): Explorations in His Religious and Literary Virtuosity (pp. 11-34). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard UP.
Sorkin, D. (1991) Transformation of German Jewry. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Sorkin, D. (1996). Moses Mendelssohn and the Religious Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sorkin, D. (1999). The Mendelssohn Myth and its Method. New German Critique, 77, 7-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/488519
Sorkin, D. (2004). Early Haskalah. In D. Sorkin, & S. Feiner (Eds.). New perspectives on the Haskalah (pp. 9-26). London: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Sorkin, D. (2008). The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton UP
Strauss, L. (1997). Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity: Essays and Lectures in Modern Jewish Thought. (K. H. Green, Ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Vogt, W. (2005). Moses Mendelssohns Beschreibung der Wirlichkeit menschlichen Erkennens. Wuerzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.
Withers, Ch. W. J. (2007). Placing the Enlightenment: Thinking Geographically about the Age of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226904078.001.0001
Yaffe, M. D. (Ed.). (2012). Leo Strauss on Moses Mendelssohn. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Downloads
-
PDF (Російська)
Downloads: 290
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).