Why Only Analytics?
The article deals with the national identification of philosophy. The author critically examines seemingly radical position of Stepan Ivanyk – as the adherent of analytical philosophy – on this and other issues.
Ivanyk, S. (2015). What is Polish Philosophy and what can It give to Ukrainian Philosophy? [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 31, 128-142. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent32.01.128
Kozlowski, R. (1970). Koncepcje “filozofii narodowej” Libelta i Trentowskiego. Archiwum historii i filozofii polskiej, 16, 33-53.
Libelt, K. (1967). Samowladztwo rozumu a objawy filozofii slowjanskiej. Warszawa: PWN.
Lysyi, I. (2004). Philosophical and artistic culture. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: VD Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.
Lysyi, I. (2013). The problem of national and cultural identity of philosophy in domestic Ukrainian studies of last decades. [In Ukrainian]. In I. Lysyi, Ethno-cultural identity of philosophy (pp. 81-118). Kyiv: VD Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.
Lysyi, I. (2006). Ukrainian philosophy: the phenomenon or phantom? [In Ukrainian]. Kyivska Rus, 5, 135-152.
Pierog, S. (Ed.). (1999). Spor o character narodowy filozofii polskiej: antologia tekstow 1810-1946. Warszawa: Wydzial Filozofii i Socjologii Un-tu Warszawskiego.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).