Why Only Analytics?

Keywords: national identification, Polish philosophy, Ukrainian philosophy, analytical philosophy, history of Ukrainian philosophy

Abstract

The article deals with the national identification of philosophy. The author critically examines seemingly radical position of Stepan Ivanyk – as the adherent of analytical philosophy – on this and other issues. 

Author Biography

Ivan Lysyi, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy
PhD in philosophy, associate professor of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies

References

Hobsbawm, E. (2005). Introduction: inventing traditions. In E. Hobsbawm, & T. Ranger, (Eds.), The Invention of Tradition (pp. 12-28). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Nіka Center.

Ivanyk, S. (2015). What is Polish Philosophy and what can It give to Ukrainian Philosophy? [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 31, 128-142. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent32.01.128

Kozlowski, R. (1970). Koncepcje “filozofii narodowej” Libelta i Trentowskiego. Archiwum historii i filozofii polskiej, 16, 33-53.

Libelt, K. (1967). Samowladztwo rozumu a objawy filozofii slowjanskiej. Warszawa: PWN.

Lysyi, I. (2004). Philosophical and artistic culture. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: VD Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.

Lysyi, I. (2013). The problem of national and cultural identity of philosophy in domestic Ukrainian studies of last decades. [In Ukrainian]. In I. Lysyi, Ethno-cultural identity of philosophy (pp. 81-118). Kyiv: VD Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.

Lysyi, I. (2006). Ukrainian philosophy: the phenomenon or phantom? [In Ukrainian]. Kyivska Rus, 5, 135-152.

Pierog, S. (Ed.). (1999). Spor o character narodowy filozofii polskiej: antologia tekstow 1810-1946. Warszawa: Wydzial Filozofii i Socjologii Un-tu Warszawskiego.
Published
2015-12-16
How to Cite
Lysyi, I. (2015). Why Only Analytics?. Sententiae, 33(2), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent33.02.166
Section
DISCUSSIONS