Criticism of Empiricism in Edmund Husserl’s works “Logical Investigations”, “Philosophy as Rigorous Science” and “Prima Philosophia”

Authors

  • Vakhtang Kebuladze Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22240/sent25.02.120

Abstract

The paper deals with the phenomenological criticism of empiricism. The author compares these two philosophical conceptions showing their similarity and their differences. Both phenomenology and empiricism are philosophies of experience; however, phenomenological analysis of empiricism reveals some of empiricism’s fundamental mistakes: 1. Empiricism is incapable to distinguish empirical and transcendental self-experience (Selbsterfahrung). 2. Empiricism fails to grasp the intentional character of consciousness. 3. Empiricism «doesn’t see the ideas». 4. Empiricism identifies contemplation with contemplation of the singular. Together with Husserl the author criticizes psychologism and naturalism and analyses empiric concepts of association and induction. He shows that, contrary to empiricism’s claims, association is not only passive but also active, and induction isn’t sufficient for creation of general notions.

Author Biography

Vakhtang Kebuladze, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD in philosophy, Associate professor of the Philosophy Department

References

Farber M. Naturalism and Subjectivism. New York: The Research Foundation of State University of New York Albany, 1959. 389 p.

Husserl E. Erste Philosophie (1923/1924). Erster Teil. Kritische Ideengeschichte. herausge-geben von Rudolf Boehm. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1956. (Husserliana, Band VII) 199 S.

Husserl E. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Edmund Husserl; [neu herausgegeben von Karl Schumann]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1976. (Husserliana, Band III/1) 323 S.

Husserl E. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik/ herausgegeben von Elmar Holenstein. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975. (Husserliana, Band XVIII) 256 S.

Husserl E. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. I Untersuchung zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis/ herausgegeben von Ursula Panzer. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984. (Husserliana, Band XIX/1) 529 S. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6068-8

Husserl E. Philosophie der Arithmetik. herausgegeben von Lothar Eley. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970. (Husserliana, Band XII). 283 S.

Husserl, E. (1994). Philosophy as Rigorous Science. [In Russian]. Novocherkassk: Saguna.

Lohmar D. Erfahrung und kategoriales Denken. Hume, Kant und Husserl über vorprädikative Erfahrung und prädikative Erkenntnis. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Acade-mic Publishers, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5120-7

Downloads

Abstract views: 640

Published

2011-12-16

How to Cite

Kebuladze, V. (2011). Criticism of Empiricism in Edmund Husserl’s works “Logical Investigations”, “Philosophy as Rigorous Science” and “Prima Philosophia”. Sententiae, 25(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent25.02.120

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.