New life of philosophical dialogue

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.120

Keywords:

interview, podcast, transcript, Oral History of Philosophy

Abstract

The comment emphasises the importance of adapting the philosophical dialogue to the new technological context. The author compares the use of dialogue in the research of the Kyiv Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy (STUIF) and the practice of The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast, created by Jack Symes. It was found that the differences between their applications are (1) the purpose of the dialogues (purely educational in the case of The Panpsycast and cognitive and educational in the case of STUIF) and (2) the status of the dialogues (dialogue as a self-sufficient product in the case of The Panpsycast and dialogue as one of the various stages of specific historical-philosophical research in the case of STUIF).

Author Biography

Nataliia Reva, University of Vienna

PhD, Visiting research fellow

References

Khoma, O. (2023) Conceptualizing the Oral History of Philosophy: The Interview Problem. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 42(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.01.069

Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2021). Models of dialogue. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(7), 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1684801

Reva, N. (2024) Orality as an Element of Historical-Philosophical Research. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 43(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.01.029

Reva, N., Kkhelufi, A. (2024) Oral History of Philosophy: Method, Methodology, (Future) Disci-pline? [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 43(1), https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.01.044

Symes, J. (Host). (2016-present). The Panpsycast. [Audio podcast]. https://thepanpsycast.com

Van Der Leeuw, K. L. (2004) Philosophical Dialogue and the Search for Truth. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(3), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking20041734

Downloads

Abstract views: 56

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Reva, N. (2024). New life of philosophical dialogue. Sententiae, 43(2), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.120

Issue

Vol. 43 No. 2 (2024): SENTENTIAE

Section

DIALOGUES ABOUT METHODOLOGY

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC