The Modernity: the question of substance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent05.01.099Keywords:
ontology, postmodernity, event, AbsoluteAbstract
The article examines the views of Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz on substance. The author proceeds from the ontological gap between modernity and postmodernity, asking: are the significance of the concept of substance really unshakable and self-evident today? To raise the question of substance means to reinterpret the classics of modernity in such a way that the internal dissonance of their thinking, which explains the transition from modernity to postmodernity, appears as an inevitable course. In particular, the author finds in the texts of early modern philosophers the theme of the ontology of the event and the pluralism of foundations, not explicitly expressed at the level of content, but present in the lacunae and gaps in their thought. This paves the way to the postmodern ontology of language and consolidates the plot of «eternal modernity».
References
Deleuze, G. (1988). Le pli, Leibniz et le baroque. Paris: Minuit.
Descartes, R. (1999). Meditations on First Philosophy. Selected Letters. [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka.
Leibniz, G. W. (1982). Monadology. [In Russian]. In G. W. Leibniz, Works in 4 vol. (Vol. 4, pp. 413-430). Moscow: Mysl.
Spinoza, B. (2000). Ethics. [In Russian]. Moscow: RIC Piligrim.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 25
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).