Defense of Authentic Neo-Pyrrhonism. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.124Keywords:
скептичне міркування, краще життя, методAbstract
Review of Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer.
References
Annas, J. (1995). The morality of happiness. New York & Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195096525.001.0001
Annas, J. (1998). Doing without objective values: Ancient and modern strategies. In S. Everson (Ed.), Ethics. Companions to ancient thought 4 (pp. 193-220). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166348.008
Annas, J., & Barnes, J. (1985). The modes of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586187
Austin, J. L. (1964). Sense and sensibilia. London, & New York: Oxford UP.
Bailey, A. (2002). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238522.001.0001
Barnes, J. (1982). The beliefs of a Pyrrhonists. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 28, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500004375
Bates, D. C. (2022). Book Review: Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Medium, https://pyrrhonism.medium.com/book-review-sextus-empiricus-neo-pyrrhonism-skepticism-as-a-rationally-ordered-experience-4c812dbad3d4
Bett, R. (2019). How to be a Pyrrhonist: The practice and significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557603
Bolzani Filho, R. (1990). Ceticismo e empirismo. Discurso, (18), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1990.37939
Burnyeat, M. (1998a). Can the Sceptic live his Scepticism? In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The origina Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 25-57). Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett.
Burnyeat, M. (1998b). The Sceptic in his place and time. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 92-126). Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett.
Claudius Galenus. (1822). Opera Omnia (vol. IV). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii.
Claudius Galenus. (1824). Opera Omnia (vol. VIII). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii.
Claudius Galenus. (1827). Opera Omnia (vol. XIV). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii.
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
Eichorn, R. (2014). How (not) to read Sextus Empiricus. Ancient Philosophy, 34(1), 121-149. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20143418
Eichorn, R. (2020). Sextus Empiricus on Isostheneia and Epoche: A Developmental Model. Skepsis, 11(21), 188-209.
Frede, M. (1990). An Empiricist view of knowledge: Memorism. In S. Everson (Ed.), Epistemolo-gy. (pp. 225-250). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Frede, M. (1998a). The Sceptic’s beliefs. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, In.: Hackett.
Frede, M. (1998b). The Sceptic’s two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 127-151). Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett.
Marcondes de Souza Filho, D. (1997). O mundo do homem feliz: considerações sobre ceticismo e valores. O que nos faz pensar, 12, 49-66.
Massie, P. (2013). Philosophy and Ataraxia in Sextus Empiricus. Peitho. Examina Antiqua, 4(1), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2013.1.10
McDowell, J. (2009). Conceptual capacities in perception. In J. McDowell (Ed.), Having the world in view: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.
Morison, B. (2011). The logical structure of the sceptic’s opposition. In J. Allen, E. Emilson, & W. Mann (Eds.), Essays in memory of Michael Frede (pp. 265-295). Oxford: Oxford UP.
Panych, O.O. (2007). Inquiries on the Problem of Scepticism in British-American Epistemology. Part one: British Modern Philosophy (Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Reid). [In Ukrainian]. Donetsk: DonNU.
Perin, C. (2010). The demands of reason: An essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557905.001.0001
Porchat Pereira, O. (2007a). Ceticismo e Argumentação. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao Ceticismo (pp. 147-172). São Paulo: UNESP. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486
Porchat Pereira, O. (2007b). Empirismo e ceticismo. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 289-322). São Paulo: UNESP. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486
Quine, W. V. (1992). The pursuit of truth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.
Sextus Empiricus. (1562). Pyrrhoniarum hipotyposeon libri tres. (H. Stephanus, Trans.). Parisiis: M. Iuuenem.
Sextus Empiricus. (1933). Outlines of Pyrrhonism. (R. G. Bury, Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.sextus_empiricus-outlines_pyrrhonism.1933
Sextus Empiricus. (2020). Outlines of Pyrrhonism (I, 1-13). [In Anc. Greek & Ukrainian]. Sententi-ae, 39(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.125
Smith, P. J. (1995). O ceticismo de Hume. São Paulo: Loyola.
Smith, P. J. (2013a). Bayle and pyrrhonism: Antinomy, method, and history. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Scepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung (pp. 19-30). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_2
Smith, P. J. (2013b). Kant’s criticism and the legacy of modern Scepticism. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Scepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung (pp. 247-263). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_17
Smith, P. J. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. São Paulo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94518-3
Strawson, P. F. (2006). Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Routledge.
Striker, G. (2004). Historical reflections on classical pyrrhonism and neo-pyrrhonism. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism (pp. 13-24). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169727.003.0002
Thorsrud, H. (2009). Ancient Scepticism. Stocksfield: Acumen. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654093
Thorsrud, H. (2019). Sextus Empiricus on the Siren Song of reason and the Skeptical defense of ordinary life. Logos & Episteme, 10(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20191012
Vogt, K. (2011). The aims of skeptical investigation. In D. Machuca (Ed.), Pyrrhonism in ancient, modern, and contemporary philosophy (pp. 33-50). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1991-0_3
Williams, M. (1988). Scepticism without theory. Review of Metaphysics, 61, 547-588.
Woodruff, P. (2010). The pyrrhonian modes. In R. Bett (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient Scepticism (pp. 208-231). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874762.012
Zvonska, L. (2020). Outlines on Pyrrhonism by Sextus Empiricus: paradigm of terms and translation intentions. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 39(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.092
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 236
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
