Defense of Authentic Neo-Pyrrhonism. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.124

Keywords:

скептичне міркування, краще життя, метод

Abstract

Review of Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Lukovyna, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

undergraduate student, Faculty of Philosophy

References

Annas, J. (1995). The morality of happiness. New York & Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195096525.001.0001

Annas, J. (1998). Doing without objective values: Ancient and modern strategies. In S. Everson (Ed.), Ethics. Companions to ancient thought 4 (pp. 193-220). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166348.008

Annas, J., & Barnes, J. (1985). The modes of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586187

Austin, J. L. (1964). Sense and sensibilia. London, & New York: Oxford UP.

Bailey, A. (2002). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238522.001.0001

Barnes, J. (1982). The beliefs of a Pyrrhonists. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 28, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500004375

Bates, D. C. (2022). Book Review: Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Medium, https://pyrrhonism.medium.com/book-review-sextus-empiricus-neo-pyrrhonism-skepticism-as-a-rationally-ordered-experience-4c812dbad3d4

Bett, R. (2019). How to be a Pyrrhonist: The practice and significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557603

Bolzani Filho, R. (1990). Ceticismo e empirismo. Discurso, (18), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1990.37939

Burnyeat, M. (1998a). Can the Sceptic live his Scepticism? In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The origina Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 25-57). Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett.

Burnyeat, M. (1998b). The Sceptic in his place and time. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 92-126). Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett.

Claudius Galenus. (1822). Opera Omnia (vol. IV). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii.

Claudius Galenus. (1824). Opera Omnia (vol. VIII). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii.

Claudius Galenus. (1827). Opera Omnia (vol. XIV). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii.

Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001

Eichorn, R. (2014). How (not) to read Sextus Empiricus. Ancient Philosophy, 34(1), 121-149. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20143418

Eichorn, R. (2020). Sextus Empiricus on Isostheneia and Epoche: A Developmental Model. Skepsis, 11(21), 188-209.

Frede, M. (1990). An Empiricist view of knowledge: Memorism. In S. Everson (Ed.), Epistemolo-gy. (pp. 225-250). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Frede, M. (1998a). The Sceptic’s beliefs. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, In.: Hackett.

Frede, M. (1998b). The Sceptic’s two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 127-151). Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett.

Marcondes de Souza Filho, D. (1997). O mundo do homem feliz: considerações sobre ceticismo e valores. O que nos faz pensar, 12, 49-66.

Massie, P. (2013). Philosophy and Ataraxia in Sextus Empiricus. Peitho. Examina Antiqua, 4(1), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2013.1.10

McDowell, J. (2009). Conceptual capacities in perception. In J. McDowell (Ed.), Having the world in view: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.

Morison, B. (2011). The logical structure of the sceptic’s opposition. In J. Allen, E. Emilson, & W. Mann (Eds.), Essays in memory of Michael Frede (pp. 265-295). Oxford: Oxford UP.

Panych, O.O. (2007). Inquiries on the Problem of Scepticism in British-American Epistemology. Part one: British Modern Philosophy (Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Reid). [In Ukrainian]. Donetsk: DonNU.

Perin, C. (2010). The demands of reason: An essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557905.001.0001

Porchat Pereira, O. (2007a). Ceticismo e Argumentação. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao Ceticismo (pp. 147-172). São Paulo: UNESP. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486

Porchat Pereira, O. (2007b). Empirismo e ceticismo. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 289-322). São Paulo: UNESP. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486

Quine, W. V. (1992). The pursuit of truth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.

Sextus Empiricus. (1562). Pyrrhoniarum hipotyposeon libri tres. (H. Stephanus, Trans.). Parisiis: M. Iuuenem.

Sextus Empiricus. (1933). Outlines of Pyrrhonism. (R. G. Bury, Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.sextus_empiricus-outlines_pyrrhonism.1933

Sextus Empiricus. (2020). Outlines of Pyrrhonism (I, 1-13). [In Anc. Greek & Ukrainian]. Sententi-ae, 39(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.125

Smith, P. J. (1995). O ceticismo de Hume. São Paulo: Loyola.

Smith, P. J. (2013a). Bayle and pyrrhonism: Antinomy, method, and history. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Scepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung (pp. 19-30). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_2

Smith, P. J. (2013b). Kant’s criticism and the legacy of modern Scepticism. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Scepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung (pp. 247-263). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_17

Smith, P. J. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. São Paulo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94518-3

Strawson, P. F. (2006). Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Routledge.

Striker, G. (2004). Historical reflections on classical pyrrhonism and neo-pyrrhonism. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism (pp. 13-24). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169727.003.0002

Thorsrud, H. (2009). Ancient Scepticism. Stocksfield: Acumen. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654093

Thorsrud, H. (2019). Sextus Empiricus on the Siren Song of reason and the Skeptical defense of ordinary life. Logos & Episteme, 10(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20191012

Vogt, K. (2011). The aims of skeptical investigation. In D. Machuca (Ed.), Pyrrhonism in ancient, modern, and contemporary philosophy (pp. 33-50). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1991-0_3

Williams, M. (1988). Scepticism without theory. Review of Metaphysics, 61, 547-588.

Woodruff, P. (2010). The pyrrhonian modes. In R. Bett (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient Scepticism (pp. 208-231). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874762.012

Zvonska, L. (2020). Outlines on Pyrrhonism by Sextus Empiricus: paradigm of terms and translation intentions. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 39(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.092

Downloads

Abstract views: 120

Published

2022-08-30

How to Cite

Lukovyna, O. (2022). Defense of Authentic Neo-Pyrrhonism. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. Sententiae, 41(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.124

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.