Порівняльний аналіз поняття системи в Ляйбніца і Вольфа

Sergii Secundant

doi:10.31649/sent39.01.008

Authors

Sergii Secundant I. Mechnikov Odessa National University http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-4956

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.01.008

Keywords:

Leibniz, the concept of a system, Intelligibility, real metaphysics, metaphysical, architectonic and heuristic principles, Cartesianism, the German tradition of, the Copernican revolution in philosophy, Wolff

Abstract

If Wolff from the very beginning was strongly influenced by Cartesianism, and his concept of system was guided by the geometric model of scientific method, Leibniz relies on the German tradition of “methodological thinking”, originated by Joachim Jung. Leibniz’s conception of system focuses mainly on algebraic analysis. The application of the term “system” mainly to metaphysics can be explained by the fact that it is this science that deals with synthetic principles and is designed to develop a rational view of the world. Based on the idea of “real metaphysics”, Leibniz justifies these principles as such that make possible the laws of physics and rational discourse in general. Leibniz does not provide a system of philosophy in the sense of traditional school philosophy. He considers metaphysics as the most consistent expression of a systematic mind and indicates heuristic principles for the construction and improvement of reasonable hypotheses.

Author Biography

Sergii Secundant, I. Mechnikov Odessa National University

doctor of sciences in philosophy, Head of Department of Philosophy and Grounds of Humanities

References

Albrecht, M. (2011). De differentia intellectus systematici & non systematici: Über den Unterschied zwischen dem systematischen und dem nicht-systematischen Verstand. Aufklärung, 23, 229-302.

Archambault, J. (2017). Leibnizian Intelligibility. In R, Pisano, M. Fichant, P. Bussotti, & A. Oliveira (Eds.), Leibniz and the Dialogue between Sciences, Philosophy and Engineering, 1646-2016. New Historical and Epistemological Insights (pp.1-19). London: The College’s Publications.

Arndt, H. W. (1971). Methodo scientifica pertractum. Mos geometricus und Kalkülbegriff in der philosophischen Teorienbildung des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin, & N.Y.: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110844900

Arndt, H. W. (2006). Einleitung in: Wolffs Gesammelte Werke: Bd.4. Vernünftige Gedanken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseligkeit. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.

Couturat, L. (1901). La logique de Leibniz d’après des documents inédits. Paris: Alcan.

Filser, H. (2001). Dogma, Dogmen, Dogmatik: eine Untersuchung zur Begründung und zur Entstehungsgeschichte einer theoretischen Disziplin von der Reformation bis zur Spätaufklärung. Münster: Lit.

Gerhardt, C. E. (1888). Zu Leibniz’ Dynamik. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 1(4), 566-581. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1888.1.4.566

Guhrauer, G. E. (1850). Joachim Jungius und sein Zeitalter. Stuttgart, & Tübingen: Cotta.

Jungius, J. (1995). De propaedeutico mathematum usu (1629), In G. Hübner (Hrsg.), Aus dem literarischen Nachlaß von Joachim Jungius. Edition der Tragödie Lucretia und der Schul- und Universitätsreden. Göttingen: Vandehoeck & Ruprecht.

Leibniz, G. W. (1880-1882). Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (Bd. 7). (C. I. Gerhardt, Hrsg.). Berlin.

Leibniz, G. W. (1903). Phoranomus seu de potentia et legibus naturae. In G. W. Leibniz, Opuscules et fragments inédits. (L. Couturat, Ed.). Paris: Alcan.

Leibniz, G. W., & Wolff, C. (1963). Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff. (C. I. Gerhardt, Hrsg.). Hildesheim: Olms.

Rescher, N. (2001). Contingentia Mundi: Leibniz on the World’s Contingency. Studia Leibnitiana, 33, 145-162.

Secundant, S. (2002). Joachim Jungius’ Philosophia Protonoetica. To the Problem of Formation of the Modern Philosophy Methodological Principles. Sententiae, 5(1), 10-21. [In Russian].

Secundant, S. (2016a). Formation of the Philosophical Concept of System: Bartholomäus Keckermann. Sententiae, 34(1), 80-94. [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent34.01.080

Secundant, S. (2016b). Formation of the Philosophical Concept of System: Clemens Timpler. Sententiae, 35(2), 41-56. [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent35.02.041

Secundant, S. (2017). Conciliatorics and eclecticism: philosophy on the way to a concept of open system. Sententiae, 36(1), 31-50. [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent36.01.031

Secundant, S. G. (2008). Mathematical paradigms in 17th Century Philosophical and Methodological Reflection. “Scientia generalis” by Joachim Jung. Epistemology and philosophy of science, 18(4), 224-234. [In Russian].

Secundant, S. G. (2012). Criticism and Method. The Idea of a Critical Method in 17-18th Century German Philosophy. Kyiv: Duh i Litera. [In Russian].

Walch, J. G. (1726). Philosophisches Lexicon. Leipzig: J. F. Gleditschen.