National Philosophy as a Subject of Comparative Research

Keywords: Historiography of Polish Philosophy, Historiography of Ukrainian Philosophy, National Philosophical Tradition, Comparative Study, Reception Study in the History of Philosophy

Abstract

The article continues the discussion “Can "national philosophy" be understood as a strictly defined object of research?” initiated in volumeXXX of Sententiae. Analyzing Tomasz Mróz’ book “Selected Issues in the History of Polish Philosophy” (2016), the authors compare the problems of historiography of Polish and Ukrainian philosophy. The authors believe that Mróz’ bookoffers an interesting perspective of comparative study of national philosophical traditions, the idea of which was suggested earlier by Vasyl Lisovy. The authors focus on the heuristic potential of the Mróz’ analysis of discussions concerning possible distinction between the terms “Polish philosophy“ and “philosophy in Poland” and his studies of Plato's reception in Poland. Such analysis allows us to raise several questions: (1) are the studies of “Polish philosophy” and “philosophy in Poland” not mutuallyexclusive, but, on the contrary, complementary genres of historiography of national philosophy? (2) howtodistinguish in the analysisof the reception of a certain philosophical doctrine in national philosophy things pertaining to the history of this philosophy as a whole, from things pertaining to the history of development of the doctrine itself?

Author Biographies

Sergii Rudenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy

Serhii Yosypenko, Hr. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine

Doctor of sciences in philosophy, Head of the Department of the History of Ukrainian Philosophy

References

Khoma, O. (2014) Foreword. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 30(1), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent30.01.005

Lisovyi, V. (2008). Ukrainian Philosophy in the Context of National Culture. In М. Yu. Rusyn (Ed.), History of Ukrainian Philosophy (pp. 3-26). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Akademvydav.

Mróz, T. (2008) Kazimierz Twardowski i Wincenty Lutosławski. Z dziejów polskich dyskusji filozoficznych. Ruch Filozoficzny, 65(4), 577-605.

Mróz, T. (2016). Selected Issues in the History of Polish Philosophy. Vilnius: Vilnius University.

Rudenko, S. (2012). Contemporary research methodology conceptions of History of Ukrainian Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Kyiv University.

Yosypenko, O. (2016). “Тhe Other” against “the Same”: Postmodern Interpretation and Historico-philosophical Commentation. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 34(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent34.01.111

Yosypenko, S. (2013). The history of Ukrainian philosophy in the 20th century: finding of the subject or invention of the discipline? [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska dumka, (1), 26-36.

Yosypenko, S. (2014). National philosophic traditions as an object of reflection in the field of the history of philosophy [in Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 30(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent30.01.052

Zweerde, E. V. d. (2009). The Place of Russian Philosophy in World Philosophical History. A Perspective. Diogenes, 222 & 223, 170-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192109336384

Published
2018-06-13
How to Cite
Rudenko, S., & Yosypenko, S. (2018). National Philosophy as a Subject of Comparative Research. Sententiae, 37(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.01.120
Section
DISCUSSIONS