Nietzsche’s Anti-Positivist Thought in His Middle Period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.03.023Keywords:
genealogy, art, causality, self-preservation instinctAbstract
In this paper, I aim to call into question a long-established tradition within the Anglo-Saxon Nietzsche scholarship that regards Nietzsche’s middle period as positivist. Unlike most scholars, I shall demonstrate that in Human, All Too Human Nietzsche does not take a positivist position, recognizing the limits of science with regard to knowledge of reality and its contributions toward unleashing human potential. Ultimately, I will show that Nietzsche was coherent, taking an anti-positivist position in all three works of the middle period.
References
Abbey, R. (2000). Nietzsche’s Middle Period. New York: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195134087.001.0001
Abbey, R. (2022). A Gay Science Avant La Lettre? Knowledge and Joy in Human, All too Human. In P. E. Kirkland (Ed.), Joy and Laughter in Nietzsche’s Philosophy: Alternative Liberatory Politics (pp. 11-25). London: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350225268.ch-001
Ansell-Pearson, K. (2018). Nietzsche’s Search for Philosophy: On the Middle Writings. London: Bloomsbury.
Cohen, J. (1999). Nietzsche’s Fling with Positivism. In B. E. Babich & R. S. Cohen (Ed.), Nietzsche, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Science: Nietzsche and the Sciences II (pp. 101-107). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2428-9_8
Danto, A. (1965). Nietzsche as Philosopher. New York: Macmillan.
Franco, P. (2011). Nietzsche’s Enlightenment: The Free-Spirit Trilogy of the Middle Period. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226259840.001.0001
Kaufmann, W. (1968). Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Meyer, M. (2019). Nietzsche’s Free Spirit Works: A Dialectical Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564847
Nietzsche, F. (2005). Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits. (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Nietzsche, F. (2008). The Gay Science. (J. Nauckhoff, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Nietzsche, F. (2015). Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality. (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Remhof, J. (2015). Naturalism, Causality, and Nietzsche’s Conception of Science. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 46(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.5325/jnietstud.46.1.0110
Ridley, A. (2007). Nietzsche on Art. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00259.x
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 14
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
