Trending practices and discussions in contemporary English-language historiography of philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.03.43Keywords:
history of philosophy, historiography of philosophy, analytic philosophy, English-language philosophy, inclusiveness, internalism, externalismAbstract
This article outlines the leading trends in contemporary English-language historiography of philosophy. It is shown that the anti-historicity, which was characteristic of analytic philosophy in its classical versions was only a moment in its development. A historical turn that began in English-language philosophical world as early as the 1960s, during the first decades of the 21st century has led to a true flourishing of the history of philosophy - both at the conceptual and institutional level. Contemporary English-speaking historians of philosophy pay considerable attention to the methodologically important distinction between real historical process, i.e., facts that took place in the past (history of philosophy), and reflections concerning means, goals, and epistemological foundations for the understanding of these facts (historiography of philosophy). It is also shown that one of the main results of a careful study of history of philosophy is inclusiveness – drawing attention to those pages or aspects of the past that, for some reason, were marginalized or completely forgotten. Factors that were traditionally dismissed as external and unimportant, now acquire the same significance as those that were previously considered as exclusively internal and important. Due to this fact traditional history of philosophy, focused primarily on the study of the most prominent representatives of Western thought, usually men by gender, is replaced by a much broader historically-philosophical canon, which includes a much wider circle of thinkers, representatives of different cultures and types of philosophizing.
References
Adamson, P. (2014-2022). Classical Philosophy. A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps (Vols. 1-6). Oxford: Oxford UP.
Adamson, P. (2016, December 31). 20 rules for history of philosophy. History of philosophy without any gaps. https://historyofphilosophy.net/all-20-rules-history-philosophy
Adamson, P. (n.d.). History of philosophy without any gaps. https://historyofphilosophy.net/
Antognazza, M. R. (2015). The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of Its History. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23(1), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.974020
Beaney, M. (2016). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(2), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341321
Bennett, J. (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford UP.
Bennett, J. (2001). Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford UP.
Catana, L. (2014). Doxographical or Philosophical History of Philosophy: On Michael Frede’s Precepts for Writing the History of Philosophy. History of European Ideas, 42(2), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2014.906149
Catana, L., & Lærke, M. (2020). Historiographies of philosophy 1800-1950. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28(3), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1709153
Collins, R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies : a Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard UP.
Copenhaver, B. (2020). A normative historiography of philosophy: room for internalism and externalism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28(1), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1608903
Department of Philosophy. (n.d.). The Eighties: a snapshot. Princeton University. https://philosophy.princeton.edu/about/eighties-snapshot
Frede, M. (1987). Introduction. In M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy (pp. ix-xxvii). Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford UP.
Frede, M. (1988). The History of Philosophy as a Discipline. The Journal of Philosophy, 85(11), 666-672. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil1988851114
Frede, M. (1992). Doxographie, historiographie philosophique de la philosophie. Revue de metaphysique et de morale, 97(3), 311-325.
Hartung, G., & Pluder, V. (2015). From Hegel to Windelband: Historiography of Philosophy in the 19th Century. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110324822
Hutton, S. (2014). Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy. History of European Ideas, 40(7), 925-937. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2014.882054
Lærke, M., Smith, J. E., & Schliesser, E. (2013). Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199857142.001.0001
Menzhulin, V. (2018). Biographical encyclopedia (dictionary) as a genre of the contemporary historiography of philosophy: Anglo-American and Ukrainian experience. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 37(1), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.01.153
Mitralexis, S. (2018). Parallel, additional or alternative histories of philosophy? Questions on the theory and methodology of the history of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26(6), 1222-1233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1458281
Normore, C. (2016). The methodology of the history of philosophy. In H. Cappelen, T. Szabó Gendler, & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical methodology (pp. 27-48). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.013.17
Nora, P. (2014). The Precent, Nation, Memory. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Klio.
Petre, J. (2017, January 8). They Kant be serious! PC students demand white philosophers including Plato and Descartes be dropped from university syllabus. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4098332/They-Kant-PC-students-demand-white-philosophers-including-Plato-Descartes-dropped-university-syllabus.html
Reck, E. (2013). The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304872
Rorty, R. (1984). The historiography of philosophy: four genres. In R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, & Q. Skinner (Eds.), Philosophy in history: essays on the historiography of philosophy (pp. 49-76). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625534.006
Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., & Skinner, Q. (1984). Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625534
Russell, B. (1900). A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. Cambridge: The University Press.
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504188
Sorell, T. (2005). On saying no to history of philsophy. In T. Sorell & G. A. Rogers (Eds.), Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy (pp. 43-60). Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford UP.
Sorell, T. (2018). Experimental philosophy and the history of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26(5), 829-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1320971
Sorell, T., & Rogers, G. A. (2005). Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford UP.
Sytsma, J., & Livengood, J. (2016). The theory and practice of experimental philosophy. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Sytsma, J., & Livengood, J. (2018). On experimental philosophy and the history of philosophy: a reply to Sorell. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27(3), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1539946
Tucker, A. (2009). Introduction. In A. Tucker (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography (pp. 1-6). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304916.ch1
Watson, R. (2002). What is the History of Philosophy and Why is it Important? Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40(4), 525-528. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2002.0085
Yas, O. V. (2005). Historiography as a term. In V. A. Smolii et al. (Ed.), Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy: V.3: E-Y. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Istorijgrafija_termin
Zavhorodnii, Y. (2021). Classical Indian philosophy in the Oxford series “History of Philosophy without any gaps”. Adamson, P., Ganeri, J. (2020). Classical Indian Philosophy: a History of Philosophy Without any Gaps. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Volume 5. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 40(2), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.02.066
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 296
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg){kind=logo}
.png){kind=logo}
