This is an outdated version published on 2021-08-16. Read the most recent version.

"Aristocratic metaphysics" and stereotypes. Jolibert, B. (2020). Descartes en questions: l'urgence d'un retour aux textes. Paris: L'Hrarmattan.

Authors

Oleg Khoma Vinnytsia National Technical University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-8281

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.02.111

Keywords:

self-affectation of cogito, animal thinking, passions, freedom, st. Augustine, Descartes’ “provisional morality”, historico-philosophical methodology

Abstract

Review of Jolibert, B. (2020). Descartes en questions: l'urgence d'un retour aux textes. Paris: L'Hrarmattan.

Author Biography

Oleg Khoma, Vinnytsia National Technical University

Doctor of sciences in philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy

References

Gouhier, H. (2006). La pensée religieuse de Descartes. Paris: J. Vrin,

Jolibert, B. (2020). Descartes en questions: l'urgence d'un retour aux textes. Paris: L'Harmattan.

Kambouchner, D. (2015). Descartes n'a pas dit: un répertoire des fausses idées sur l'auteur du Discours de la méthode avec les éléments utiles et une esquisse d'apologie. Paris: Les Belles lettres.

Khoma, O. (2016). The Role of Skeptical Evidence in the First and Second “Meditations”. Article 1. The Doubt according to Descartes and Sextus Empiricus. Sententiae, 35(2), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent35.02.006

Khoma, O. (2017). The Role of Skeptical Evidence in the First and Second “Meditations”. Article 2. Certitudo. Sententiae, 36(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent36.02.018

Marion, J.-L. (1991). Le cogito s’affecte-t-il? In Marion, J.-L., Questions cartésiennes: méthode et métaphysique (pp. 153-188). Paris: PUF.

Mehl, É. (2012). Auto-affection et cogito. Sur le cartésianisme de Michel Henry. In S. Ebbersmeyer (Ed.), Emotional Minds (pp. 31-50). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.

Abstract views: 397

Published

2021-08-15 — Updated on 2021-08-16

Versions

How to Cite

Khoma, O. (2021). "Aristocratic metaphysics" and stereotypes. Jolibert, B. (2020). Descartes en questions: l’urgence d’un retour aux textes. Paris: L’Hrarmattan. Sententiae, 40(2), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.02.111 (Original work published August 15, 2021)

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 40 No. 2 (2021): SENTENTIAE

Section

REVIEWS

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).