Offendicula and Idola: Coincidence and Divergences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22240/sent21.02.003

Abstract

In article the comparative analysis of gnoseological concepts of two English thinkers who are at the beginnings of empiricism is carried out. A comparison subject are, first of all, “Obstacles for true comprehension” (offendicula) at Roger Bacon and “Errors of human mind” (idola) at Francis Bacon. The continuity of ideas of two thinkers is proved that, however, does not belittle F.Bacon role as creator of new methodology of a science.

Author Biography

Gennadii Aliaiev, Y. Kondratiuk Poltava National Technical University

doctor of sciences in philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy

References

Bacon, F. (1977) Selected works in 2 vol. (Vol. I). [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.

Bacon, F. (1978) Selected works in 2 vol. (Vol. II). [In Russian]. Moscow: Mysl.

Bacon, R. (1999). Introduction to Secretum secretorum… [In Russian]. In I. T. Kasavin (Ed.), Hermetism, magie, natural philosophy in European culture of XIII–XIX (pp. 44-99). Moscow: Kanon+, & Reabilitatzia.

Bacon, R. (2005). Selected works. [In Russian]. Moscow: Franciscan Press.

Vinogradov, K. (2005). Roger Bacon's life and works. [In Russian]. In R. Bacon, Selected works (pp. 5-14). Moscow: Franciscan Press.

Downloads

Abstract views: 273

Published

2009-12-16

How to Cite

Aliaiev, G. (2009). Offendicula and Idola: Coincidence and Divergences. Sententiae, 21(2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent21.02.003

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2009): SENTENTIAE

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License


    Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC