Диджитальний потенціал історії філософії

Nataliia Shcherbyna-Supruniuk

doi:10.31649/sent43.02.124

Digital Potential of the History of Philosophy

Authors

Nataliia Shcherbyna-Supruniuk Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-9572

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.124

Keywords:

podcasts, public philosophy, philosophical dialogues

Abstract

The author analyses the modern influence of digitalization on the development of the history of philosophy and the prospects of the digital history of philosophy projects. It has been established that these projects provide researchers with: (1) better opportunities for intercultural and interdisciplinary exchanges; (2) significantly greater variability of methods of producing knowledge in the field of history of philosophy; (3) the possibility of involving more specialists in cooperation; (4) greater transparency and variability of research results; (5) a new layer of issues to research. If we talk about public philosophy, these projects help tailor popularization materials better to meet the needs and interests of the general public.

Author Biography

Nataliia Shcherbyna-Supruniuk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD

References

Fickers, A. et al. (n.d.). Studies in Digital History and Hermeneutics. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/serial/sdhh-b/html

Ilina, H. (2024, February 9). Philosophical Work in the Age of Digital Reproduction: A Continuation of Walter Benjamin’s Discourse in the Digital History of Philosophy (pp. 1-4). PhilArchive. https://philarchive.org/rec/ILIPWI

Khoma, O. (2023). Conceptualizing the Oral History of Philosophy: The Interview Problem. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 42(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.01.069

Kononenko, T. (n.d.). 3D Philosophy. Digital History of Philosophy. https://dhp.knu.ua/projects/taras-kononenko-3d-philosophy

Kononenko, T., & Sobolievskyi, Y. (2024). The Concept of “Physical Objectˮ in the History of Philosophy. Appropriateness of Application. [In Ukrainian]. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 2(9), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2023/9-4/15

Symes, J. (Host). (2016-present). The Panpsycast. [Audio podcast]. https://thepanpsycast.com

Symes, J., Reva, N., Shcherbyna-Supruniuk, N., & Khoma, V. (2024). Rebirth of Socratic Origins of Philosophy in the Digital Era. Sententiae, 43(2), ??-??.

Zalta, E. N., & Nodelman, U. (Eds.). (2024). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Meta-physics Research Lab. Philosophy Department Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/

Downloads

PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 81

Abstract views: 98

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Shcherbyna-Supruniuk, N. (2024). Digital Potential of the History of Philosophy. Sententiae, 43(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.124

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 43 No. 2 (2024): SENTENTIAE

Section

DIALOGUES ABOUT METHODOLOGY

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).