TY - JOUR AU - Terletsky, Vitali PY - 2020/06/24 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - Kant’s Theory of Genius: Some Questions of Sources Reconstruction JF - Sententiae JA - Sent VL - 39 IS - 1 SE - ARTICLES DO - 10.31649/sent39.01.029 UR - https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/493 SP - 29-53 AB - <p>The article deals with Kant’s doctrine of genius, presented in the&nbsp;<em>Critique of the Power of Judgment</em>, in connection with the latest discussion of which author of that time could have a decisive influence on Kant’s conception. In the first section, I reconstruct the line of Kant’s argument in CPJ §§ 46-50 where he explicates the nature of genius and show that its characteristics such as contrast to rules, the complementarity of taste, spirit as a principle of aesthetic ideas, the proportion between the power of imagination and understanding become constitutive for his theory. In the second section, I refer to opinio communis in the research literature that Kant formed his theory of genius under the influence of the Scottish philosopher Alexander Gerard’s&nbsp;<em>Essay on Genius</em>&nbsp;(1774). This opinion is shared by the vast majority of contemporary researchers (P. Giordanetti, J. Zammito, M. Kuehn, P. Guyer, and others). Still, its origins go back to the monograph of O. Schlapp (1901). At the same time, other researchers (M. Frank, V. Zanetti) claim that C. F. Gellert, or merely German philosophy of the XVIII century, had a significant influence on Kant’s theory (A. Bauemler). In the third section, on the example of Kant’s four propositions about genius (the contrast of genius and the (great) head, the productive power of imagination, the proportion of understanding and the power of imagination, the difference of genius and scientific talent), I claim that similar views were common among various German and foreign authors of that time. Based on this, I argue that Kant’s conception of genius as a complex theory cannot be reduced to the influence of one author or one tradition. Hence its correct reconstruction should consider the rich and diverse material from different sources from aesthetics, poetics, rhetoric, art, and literature up to metaphysics.</p> ER -